Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Search4Truth
Personally, I would rather the pilots be concentrating on their business of flying the plane rather than trying to take down hijackers.

I think we would be much better off with armed marshalls on the plane who can do the security and let the pilots be pilots.

75 posted on 09/28/2001 11:25:43 AM PDT by arjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: arjay
"I think we would be much better off with armed marshalls on the plane who can do the security and let the pilots be pilots. "

The last line of the defense is the cockpit and its defenders are the pilots. Why are they not armed? How are we safer that they are not? Why are we not taking this simple precaution?

Why is President Bush opposing the arming of pilots. We are getting a lot of interesting alternatives, but why not the most obvious, simplest and cost effective solution. We are willing to consider shooting down hijacked commercial airliners, but pilots with handguns, out of the question. Where are all the 2nd Amendment folks on this issue? Or does President Bush get a pass on the 2ND Amendment?

80 posted on 09/28/2001 11:35:11 AM PDT by Search4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson