Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pegleg
I have heard this argument before but to settle this argument ,Peter was in Rome, he died there. Also, he was the first Bishop or Cardinal at Antioch, to both Orthodox and Catholic alike and he was the third Bishop of Rome, not the first.
25 posted on 09/27/2001 7:46:29 PM PDT by peter the great
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: peter the great
Hi Peter, welcome aboard.

I have heard this argument before but to settle this argument ,Peter was in Rome, he died there. Also, he was the first Bishop or Cardinal at Antioch, to both Orthodox and Catholic alike and he was the third Bishop of Rome, not the first.

Are you Orthodox? I've not heard the claim that Peter was the third bishop of Rome. Who were the two before him?

45 posted on 09/27/2001 9:08:35 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: peter the great
I have heard this argument before but to settle this argument ,Peter was in Rome,

No argument to settle with me, I agree with you. If you can cite any other sources we have not covered it would be much appreciated.

59 posted on 09/28/2001 5:54:46 AM PDT by pegleg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: peter the great
Ref;150,#25
Peter the THIRD Bishop of Rome ? Who,pray tell,are one and two? I thought the order was Peter, Linus, Cletus, Check World Almanac for my source . (Is that a real source, Havoc?)
69 posted on 09/28/2001 7:11:19 AM PDT by dadwags (dadwags2flash.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson