Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bulldog905
Pat is about as relevant to the traditional conservative movement as Mikhail Gorbachev is to Russia today.

Then why do all you Pat haters bother to comment?

169 posted on 09/28/2001 10:36:56 PM PDT by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: Pelham
Then why do all you Pat haters bother to comment?

I'm not a "Pat Hater". I agreed with many of the things Buchanan had to say about the culture war, immigration, abortion, the second amendment, and a fortress American strategy.

However, his stuff about Hitler came awful close to an apologia for Nazism. I don't like it when liberals apologize or rationalize for communism either.

The 2000 campaign, in which Pat received a $12,000,000 gift from the taxpayer, was the final straw for me, and many others sympathetic, but not committed to the man.

Buchanan's whining that his pathetic 0.5% showing in the popular vote was due to a media and debate freeze-out has some validity, but even his counterpart on the left, Nader managed 4%.

The American people made the only judgement that counts about Buchanan last November. Pat's quixotic campaigns for President were totally about enriching his coffers and bloating his ego. The man may be a good pundit, but he would make an awful leader.

Only the cult of personality types can't see this now.

170 posted on 09/29/2001 5:00:56 AM PDT by bulldog905
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson