Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex
A proper argument against any policy should discuss the merits of the policy, not political groupings. This one doesn't. I believe you missed this

If the United States invades Iraq, bombs Hezbollah and conducts strikes on Syria and Iran, this war will metastasize into a two-continent war from Algeria to Afghanistan, with the United States and Israel alone against a half-dozen Arab and Muslim states. The first casualties would be the moderate Arabs — Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states — who were our Cold War and Gulf War allies.

The war Netanyahu and the neo cons want, with the United States and Israel fighting all of the radical Islamic states, is the war bin Laden wants, the war his murderers hoped to ignite when they sent those airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

156 posted on 09/28/2001 9:42:11 AM PDT by madrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: madrussian
That is an uncoherent argument, because the question immediately arises, what if Iraq, Syria or Iran harbor Osama bin Laden terrorists, or Hezbollah merges with them.

Buchanan could have made this argument: that unless Osama terrorists move to a particualr country, or receives a substantial suport from a particular country, we shouldn't attack that country in the context of this war. That would have been a valid comment, and I would agree with it.

157 posted on 09/28/2001 10:18:47 AM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson