[TKEman]

Even if I agreed with your analysis, I would still say it was all justified. I wouldn't necessarily call it a smear campaign. Pat's ideas are bad, as is fully demonstrated in his book. As I mentioned above, I posted a response regarding this to your leader, Arator, and he never got back to me. Additionally, Pat's a money grabber, taking my money to fund and fuel his crank ideas in a futile election quest. It all boomeranged on him. And yet this "campaign" is called a smear campaign.

[ouroboros]

As I mentioned above, I posted a response regarding this to your leader, Arator, and he never got back to me.

Arator is not my leader. I am an "army of one".

Additionally, Pat's a money grabber, taking my money to fund and fuel his crank ideas in a futile election quest.

Well, as they say in the 'Hood, "Don't hate the player, hate the game". Almost every presidental candidate takes Federal money of some sort. The system is in place and the 12.6 million was gonna go somewhere. Bay's kids college fund is as good a place for it as any (that's a joke).

*Who else finds this indenting stupid and the font girly?

[Pelham]

Can't you start your own Pat Buchanan is doo-doo thread, and let this one discuss his article?

You may now return to your smearing.