To: Tai_Chung
Yep, the author has it right. Instead of the blind lashing out, he's got the steely, crushing hand. The Islamic revolition backlash that was to occur is just his fantasy. I think it's all going to be lots of SAS/Special Forces operations with the occasional air strike. Low level actions without a wholescale invasion.
NaW.
(Too bad. We really, really wanted to nuke somebody...)
To: SodiumWarthog
I agree. Time to dust off some off the old style atom bombs of the Hiroshima range and take out a few hundred thousand. Not to destroy the entire nation just to remind people that we have used nukes in anger before and to put the fear of our God in them. BTW: The reason we didn't kill Saddam during D.S was the Christian belif in redemption. We wanted to believe that Saddam would change his evil ways. We see that we were wrong now.
47 posted on
09/27/2001 8:17:42 AM PDT by
ffusco
To: ALL
If you are inclined to hit the abuse button, please copy the entire post you are reporting into the abuse box. Copy from the "To:" through the "posted on" line. It makes my work here so much easier and faster.
If you expect a reply from a moderator, you must sign your complaint.
Thank you.
To: SodiumWarthog
Yep, the author has it right. Instead of the blind lashing out, he's got the steely, crushing hand. You mean this one?
112 posted on
09/27/2001 12:51:27 PM PDT by
Dan Day
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson