Laz pointed that out- I agree that I was needlessly vague in a manner that could easily be read the wrong way. I changed the text on my web page to be a bit more clear.
Thanks, and I never mind constructive criticism.
It's a common misconception that the Soviet Union did not have any warm-water ports, probably arising from their experiences in WW2, when the only functional ports on the Eastern Front were above the Artic Circle (Murmansk and Arkhangel'sk). Another possible source of the misconception was the prevailing (and correct) U.S. Naval North Atlantic strategy of defending against a Soviet naval surge by defending gaps (Norway-UK, Greenland-Iceland-UK, even the Denmark Straight). This strategy left the impression that the Soviets were land-locked, when in reality, the Soviet Union merely was geographically unsuited for naval operations.
In any case, Soviet-era warm-water ports (not including the Pacific or the Black Sea) included Kaliningrad (Kaliningrad Oblast), Klaipeda (Lithuania), Riga (Latvia), and possibly Tallinn (Estonia). Note that, to this day, Kaliningrad remains the HQ of the Russian Baltic Fleet. (Although Kaliningrad itself is geographically separated from the Russian Federation).
Happy to help . . . I didn't read the comments on this thread, so maybe someone else had already pointed this out to you . . . and I'm happy that you believe in constructive criticism.