[Frumious Bandersnatch]

Ah, a Dawkinsian view.  I've heard similarly persuasive arguments made from the Gouldian viewpoint.  Both sides love using mixed-metaphors.

[stryker]

Anyone interested in this type of inquiry should read Darwin on Trial, by Phillip E. Johnson, which very adequately expresses all of the problems with the current state of evolutionist theory and demonstrates that it takes just as much of a leap of faith to believe in modern evolutionary theory as it does to believe in Genesis. Johnson does this without promoting the Creationist view. His aim is not to promote creationism, but to demonstrate that evolution is an inadequate theory of creation based upon the current state of the scientific evidence.