Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Young men flee military service against allies
The Times ^ | September 25, 2001 | CATHERINE PHILP

Posted on 09/25/2001 7:59:27 AM PDT by Kenyon

Young men flee military service against allies

FROM CATHERINE PHILP IN QUETTA, PAKISTAN
WHEN two student friends turned up in Mohammad’s mountain village last week with shaven heads and no possessions, he knew it was time to get out of Afghanistan. His friends, minority Tajiks like him, had fled from Kabul after Taleban soldiers came to the university and tried to force them into military service against an American attack.

Refugees such as Mohammad arriving in Pakistan are bringing reports of Taleban attempts to conscript young men from persecuted minorities to fight in a “holy war”.

The Taleban defence minister claimed yesterday to have mobilised an additional 300,000 troops, most of them volunteers ready to die defending the regime. Reports from Afghanistan, however, paint a picture of a regime beginning to crumble as its commmanders desert.

Thousands of Tajiks, Hazaras, Uzbeks and other minorities are fleeing their homes in central Afghanistan as Taleban fighters visit their villages to round up conscripts. “Every family is being asked to hand over one young man,” Mohammad said. “I left before they could come for me.”

Nobody here believes the Taleban’s estimate of their fighting force. Analysts say that before the present crisis, their army numbered fewer than 50,000. Even with conscription, it could not have swelled above 70,000, far less if reports of large-scale defections are true. Refugees from Herat say that only a quarter of Taleban officials and fighters remain.

Refugees passing through the Taleban stronghold of Kandahar have found it empty as commanders flee to the hills with their families. The remaining Taleban are going to desperate measures to convince people that they are still in charge. Shopkeepers have been forced to remain open to project an aura of normality.

Anti-Taleban leaders in Quetta say that internal opposition to the Taleban is growing as the prospect of military strikes increases. One figure the people could rally around is Afghanistan’s exiled King, Mohammed Zahir Shah, who issued a radio appeal last week calling on Afghans to rise up and “rescue themselves”. He has called for the international community to help to restore Afghanistan’s traditional tribal council in place of the Taleban. “Everyone heard it,” Mr Ullah said. “They believe that if Zahir Shah comes, we will be saved.” People are also pinning their hopes on Ismail Khan,the local opposition commander, who controls a patch of Northern Alliance territory south of the city. “People are very excited and optimistic. They believe that if there is an American attack, Ismail Khan will come back and take control of the city.”

Emboldened by the prospect of American backing, opposition force have begun a big offensive against the Taleban in northern Afghanistan. Artillery and rocket fire thundered across Balkh Province yesterday as Taleban and Northern Alliance forces fought for a strategic road linking central Afghanistan with Uzbekistan.

A further setback to the Taleban’s hold on power came with the withdrawal this weekend of Pakistani diplomats from Kabul. “Without Pakistani support, the Taleban will crumble within days,” Hamid Karzai, the tribal council’s leader in exile, said at his home in Quetta. “Look at all the people, they wouldn’t be running away if they supported the Taleban.”



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Are they falling apart or simply heading to the mountains for a long fight?
1 posted on 09/25/2001 7:59:27 AM PDT by Kenyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kenyon
Falling apart.
2 posted on 09/25/2001 8:03:31 AM PDT by KirklandJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenyon

Afghan King Mohammad Zahir Shah (right), with grandson
Mostapha Zaher, has lived in Rome since his ouster in 1973.

3 posted on 09/25/2001 8:04:54 AM PDT by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
Whoa! Ain't too purty, is he?
4 posted on 09/25/2001 8:06:48 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kenyon
This has some of the earmarks of Saddam Hussein's "invincible Republican Guards" fiasco in the Gulf War. Those Iraqi soldiers were also supposed to "fight to the death", but then began surrendering to journalists who were armed only with video cameras.

It's one thing to get a few dozen or even a few hundred fanatics who will lay their life on the line expecting to lose it. It's very different to get tens of thousands of such.

5 posted on 09/25/2001 8:10:33 AM PDT by Joe Bonforte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenyon
bold off
6 posted on 09/25/2001 8:12:52 AM PDT by packrat35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenyon
Review the history of Agfghanistan. You will find absolutely no tendency to fight to the death in a hopeless cause. Rather, there is a strong tendency to betray their fellows and jump in on the side of the big dog. Up to now, with the support of Pakistan, the Taliban has been the big dog. A much bigger dog just got to town, however.

I doubt Taliban control can be more than superficial, especially in the countryside. True power is probably still held by family and clan leaders. They are probably falling all over themselves trying to get in good with the allies. Each clan would love to take the opportunity to settle scores with their rivals who hang on a little too long with the Taliban.

Afghanis have traditionally not been terribly religious. More attention is given to the sport of war and raiding.

You have to remember that Afghanistan is sort of the ultimate armed society. Every male goes heavily armed all the time. How can a small group like the Taliban really control them? OTOHm, the US doesn't want to control them. We're anxious to give them all sorts of money and neat weapons for switching sides. Expect to see an avalanche of support for the allies.

7 posted on 09/25/2001 8:13:30 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenyon
Are they falling apart or simply heading to the mountains for a long fight?

Well, they need people if they're going to fight. The Taliban apparently lost the hearts and minds of the Afghan people a long time ago, and has been running on the intertia of power ever since. Once they lose power, there's no longer any reason for anyone to support them.

8 posted on 09/25/2001 8:13:44 AM PDT by 537 Votes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 537 Votes
No Dying for Allayh
9 posted on 09/25/2001 8:16:31 AM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bonforte
This has some of the earmarks of Saddam Hussein's "invincible Republican Guards" fiasco in the Gulf War. Those Iraqi soldiers were also supposed to "fight to the death", but then began surrendering to journalists who were armed only with video cameras.

The Republican Guard divisions did stand and fight (and at 73 Easting, one died in place in a rearguard action). It was the regular and conscript divisions which were surrendering en masse. The RG were tough, well-led, battle-hardened troops who were outgunned technologically. It wasn't they who were caught on the infamous highway of death, and most RG actually escaped the anihilation of the Iraqi army.

10 posted on 09/25/2001 8:18:40 AM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Close tags!
11 posted on 09/25/2001 8:19:10 AM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kenyon
Falling apart. No doubt recalling those images from 1991 of crispy Iraqis and no doubt feeling 'unworthy' of the honor of martyrdom.
12 posted on 09/25/2001 8:22:30 AM PDT by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
The Republican Guard divisions did stand and fight...

Agreed, but the pre-war propaganda and rhetoric was that the Republican Guards were the core of a capable army that would put up serious opposition. As you point out, the Guards didn't have the weapons to do that very well, and the rest of the army turned out to be more interested in saving their skins that saving Hussein's fantasies about world domination.

Similarly, I'm sure the Taliban have a core group of fanatics that will fight hard, but they don't have the weapons to do so very effectively, and the rest of the "army" is not very motivated to get killed supporting the Taliban.

13 posted on 09/25/2001 8:25:54 AM PDT by Joe Bonforte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
No Dying for Allayh

Who would want to die for a dead R+B singer?

14 posted on 09/25/2001 8:26:01 AM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Junior
I agree, the Republican Guard did not surrender.

The Taliban has much less than Iraq had.

The Taliban cannot claim to have 1 million men under arms.
The Taliban does not have diplomatic relations with other countries.
The Taliban is in civil war which is a serious threat to their power. Saddam didn't have any serious internal opposition.
The Taliban has no natural resources like oil.
The Taliban does not have modern weapons.
It was never an official US goal to overthrow the Iraqi government, the Taliban does not have the luxury.
The Taliban's call for a jihad and their people flee to the mountains and other countries.

The Taliban will lose much worst than the Iraqi military.

15 posted on 09/25/2001 8:28:00 AM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Let us all hope so.
16 posted on 09/25/2001 8:28:53 AM PDT by Kenyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kenyon
Awesome. Guess now that Ol 'Hey Osama Ihad Yomama' realizes that he f'd up in a MAJOR way. Dumbass....lost it all. Now he's just a friggin 2bit wanted convict on the run.
17 posted on 09/25/2001 8:29:14 AM PDT by Hammerhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenyon
I actually think it may be possible to terminate the Taleban without a single American soldier on the ground. Air cover for the Northern Alliance, and the return of the King, uniting the anti-Taleban factions may be enought to cross this item off of Bush's "to-do" list.

Then, we should get relatively free run of the countryside in our effort to exterminate Ossama. Cross off another item on the list.

If I'm Saddam Hussein, I don't like the looks of how this thing is shaping up.

18 posted on 09/25/2001 8:30:14 AM PDT by borkrules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: borkrules
The Pakistanis now need to start squeezing north ward to trap all these radicals. India and Pakistan REALLY need to put the Kashmir issue on hold for about 10 years till this whole radical Islam issue straightens out. Why, cuz if the radicals get ahold of those Pakistani nukes, guaranteed India and Pakistan will be nuking each other.
19 posted on 09/25/2001 8:34:48 AM PDT by Hammerhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kenyon
Refugees passing through the Taleban stronghold of Kandahar have found it empty as commanders flee to the hills with their families.

What’s up with this? Don't the leaders of the Taleban want to die as martyrs for allah?? No virgins at the great cathouse in the sky?? I guess that idiot tale is just for the morons they train to be mass murderers.

The remaining Taleban are going to desperate measures to convince people that they are still in charge.

Man we are going to slaughter these terrorist scum like the inhuman pigs that they are. That is if we can get these brave muslim warriors to stop running away!

20 posted on 09/25/2001 8:39:40 AM PDT by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson