That is no refutation. For the materialist view that there is no God to be true, inanimate matter must have been able to organize itself into cells and living beings. We find no such ability anywhere in inanimate matter so GNDLGUN's post constitutes serious proof against the materialism promoted by evolution and evolutionists.
It doesn't have to assemble itself into "living beings," unless you are including cells in that category, in which case your statement is redundant. A simple life form is not a sand castle. Sand castles (and watches) remain irrelevant to the discussion.
We find no such ability anywhere in inanimate matter so GNDLGUN's post constitutes serious proof against the materialism promoted by evolution and evolutionists.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because we haven't found it yet does not mean that we will not. You apparently don't understand what a "proof" is.