[NonZeroSum]

That is bovine scatology. An refutation to an argument requires no refence to the opponent unless that opponent uses such reference as support. I did no such thing.

I have refuted your arguments. That you're too ignorant to recognize it is no fault of mine.

[AndrewC]

I have refuted your arguments

Sorry Capt Picard, saying "make it so" does not make it so. My argument was

After all, there is only a 2% difference in the DNA which came about in 5 million years, therefore, randomly, one should expect 1/5,000,000th chance of that in 1 year. Those are lottery odds. (actually the odds are much worse, but you figure them out, and be careful, random things have no direction)

leading to

You now have the golden opportunity to put your numbers where your opinion is.

Which you have yet to do.