You are totally dishonest. In post#121 in answer to why there were no transitional species you said:
"Everyone is indeed transitional"
You insult me for asking you to give proof of your statement. Clearly all you can do is insult and lie. If everyone is transitional the fossil record should not show a single jump between species, it should not show two fossils that are in any way alike. It should show a vast cornucopia of totally different bones. It does not show that. It shows bones found thousands of miles apart and tens of millions of years from each other which are clearly the same. The fossil record disproves evolution.
Everyone? You mean PEOPLE?? I almost can't believe even one of the evos made such a claim.
We're all transitional? From what? I mean, they've demonstrated that we cannot have descended from the neanderthal and all other hominids are much further from us both in time and morphology THAN the neanderthal. That leaves nothing on Earth as a plausible ancestor for modern man.
The other question is To what? The genome project has also shown that the only difference between Bantus and Germans is frequency of genes present in both groups, i.e. there is in actual fact only one human race and thus no evidence whatsoever of any group of humans in any process of evolving into anything else.
Thus, there is zero evidence on the planet of modern man ever having been involved in any sort of a process which could be called evolution.
I had nothing to do with post #121. Discussing anything with you is a total waste of bandwidth.