Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
There is a huge constitutional argument in this country over states powers under the 14th.

No there is not. Anyone who is anyone knows that the 14th restricts states to the BoR. The right to property does not, and can not mean the right to own anything under the sun. At least not in the state in question.

And just because you call me "communitarian" does not make it so. And for me to be on the "fringe", would mean that the majority of America want's all drugs legal. You obvious denial of your 1% opinion is grounds for psychological help.

281 posted on 12/11/2001 9:41:55 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]


To: Texaggie79
And just because you call me "communitarian" does not make it so.

Your denial does not make it not. true

284 posted on 12/11/2001 10:00:14 PM PST by Doctor Doom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

To: Texaggie79
'Anyone who is anyone' would know that far more than 1% of americans oppose the WOD's.

Dream on kiddo.

288 posted on 12/11/2001 10:14:01 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

To: Texaggie79
Anyone who is anyone knows that the 14th restricts states to the BoR.

The BoR was applicable to the states long before the 14th amendment came along. Dred Scot was a lousy ruling, Taney was a racist scumbag and you don't have to be born here to have full posession of your rights.

290 posted on 12/11/2001 10:26:09 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson