Not when the possesion of the substance or item prohibited violates others' rights. How else could you say that CP is illegal to own?
Not when the possesion of the substance or item prohibited violates others' rights. How else could you say that CP is illegal to own?
You answered you own question. CP is evidence of a violation of a childs rights.
How are semi-auto 'assault' style rifles, prohibited in CA, violating others rights? Your gun banning majority says, exactly as you, that the state can ban for 'potential' harm they may do, just like drugs.
You never answered #160, on your 'imaginary harm', either. Is it safe to assume you can't?