Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texaggie79, Uriel1975
To endanger your neighbors against their will. It is as simple as that. Potential for harm is a violation of other's rights when high enough.

I think our little authoritarian friend needs to hear about fences some more.

Tex: come on. By your principles, we'd have to outlaw alcohol, which causes a great deal more potential for harm than many of the drugs currently banned.

151 posted on 09/24/2001 8:58:29 PM PDT by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: A.J.Armitage
By your principles, we'd have to outlaw alcohol, which causes a great deal more potential for harm than many of the drugs currently banned

As you already know (but probably won't admit) states can constitutionally prohibit that if they see it to be too harmful. I personally don't, and neither does the majority of my state.

156 posted on 09/24/2001 9:20:19 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson