Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
REALLY?!?!? Well ping in all the FReepers you guys have apparently settled the question. While your at it, call up all the media sources, you can now prove this position to the American people now huh? LOL

Sorry, you of all people, with your insane view on the constitution cannot touch my argument. You guys were beaten the first time anyone mentions the founders supporting sodomy laws. The rest is just for fun.

You have no argument behind the constitution, so you must revert to anarchical sources such as Ayn Rand.

You have been defeated since day one. Your blind stubbornness simply won't allow you to see it.

119 posted on 09/24/2001 5:46:38 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: Texaggie79
Sorry, you of all people, with your insane view on the constitution cannot touch my argument. You guys were beaten the first time anyone mentions the founders supporting sodomy laws. The rest is just for fun. You have no argument behind the constitution, so you must revert to anarchical sources such as Ayn Rand.

=====================================

--- Telling. -- You mention insane & sodomy in the same slur.

Then you go on to refute your own view on my 'insane' view, by claiming I have no argument 'behind' [backing up] the constitution. -- There is no real need, is there?
However, if YOU need one, check out AJ's words above on inalienable rights being beyond/behind the constitution.

132 posted on 09/24/2001 7:26:11 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: Texaggie79
anarchical sources such as Ayn Rand.

Man calls black white. Pigs fly. Film at 11.

134 posted on 09/24/2001 7:43:03 PM PDT by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson