Skip to comments.
Government Against the People
Words of Truth ^
| Aaron Armitage
Posted on 09/24/2001 12:49:15 PM PDT by A.J.Armitage
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 361-379 next last
To: tpaine
There is a huge constitutional argument in this country over states powers under the 14th. No there is not. Anyone who is anyone knows that the 14th restricts states to the BoR. The right to property does not, and can not mean the right to own anything under the sun. At least not in the state in question.
And just because you call me "communitarian" does not make it so. And for me to be on the "fringe", would mean that the majority of America want's all drugs legal. You obvious denial of your 1% opinion is grounds for psychological help.
To: Texaggie79
Look up rights in the dictionary.The definition you gave from some dictionary or another is wrong. It's a line of "positive rights" BS.
Are YOU illiterate? I never said you said otherwise.
Then why did you repeat yourself?
Perhaps not for an editor of newsweek but I put several sentences into one because I am to tired to spell it all out. It makes sense.
Then you tried to write several sentences as one and wound up with none at all.
I'll quote it again, underlining the subject clause.
However, laws that prevent the legal sale of substances that take away people's ability to reason, to choose to stop using the drugs, to see reality, to recognize their kids as their kids and not a secret agent that they decapitate (actual event), or any other necessary inhibition to function as a responsible human.
That went, "However, laws that" yada yada (very lengthy yada yada), but you never actually got around to giving us a verb or an object.
To: Cultural Jihad
You really didn't answer the question. Are you an idealogue who believes that he can force me to take medication?
283
posted on
12/11/2001 9:57:43 PM PST
by
Demidog
To: Texaggie79
And just because you call me "communitarian" does not make it so. Your denial does not make it not. true
To: Texaggie79
Yup grandma is now selling her body in front of her small children for that smack money. I'm sorry to hear that. Have you sued her doctor yet?
285
posted on
12/11/2001 10:04:26 PM PST
by
Demidog
To: A.J.Armitage; Texaggie79
They say that they are arguing for the sake of the lurkers. I hope they at least do the lurkers a favor and slow down long enough to complete a sentence. Then perhaps the lurkers would have some idea of what they are talking about even if they themselves do not.
286
posted on
12/11/2001 10:07:28 PM PST
by
Demidog
To: tpaine; Cultural Jihad
I think that it is extremely interesting that the loudest complainers about "anti-patriotism" and "Hate America Firsters" take monikers like "Cultural Jihad" (terrorist by any other name) and "Nuke 'Em Glowing" while espousing the most anti-American sentiment imaginable.
287
posted on
12/11/2001 10:10:46 PM PST
by
Demidog
To: Texaggie79
'Anyone who is anyone' would know that far more than 1% of americans oppose the WOD's.
Dream on kiddo.
288
posted on
12/11/2001 10:14:01 PM PST
by
tpaine
To: Demidog
Some of the hypocrisy on FR is mindboggling.
[and that's what makes unmasking it such fun]
289
posted on
12/11/2001 10:25:49 PM PST
by
tpaine
To: Texaggie79
Anyone who is anyone knows that the 14th restricts states to the BoR. The BoR was applicable to the states long before the 14th amendment came along. Dred Scot was a lousy ruling, Taney was a racist scumbag and you don't have to be born here to have full posession of your rights.
290
posted on
12/11/2001 10:26:09 PM PST
by
Demidog
To: A.J.Armitage
However, laws that prevent the legal sale of substances that take away people's ability to reason, to choose to stop using the drugs, to see reality, to recognize their kids as their kids and not a secret agent that they decapitate (actual event), or any other necessary inhibition to function as a responsible human........... are not only constitutional, but are GOOD.
To: Demidog
Have you sued her doctor yet?The obvious ludicrousness of that statement was intended as sarcasm. But you knew that already. You just hate to admit that prescription drugs, used as prescribed, do not destroy lives (not only of the user, but those around them) as do hard drugs.
To: tpaine
'Anyone who is anyone' would know that far more than 1% of americans oppose the WOD's. What does that have to do with anything? I oppose the WOD.
To: Texaggie79
You just hate to admit that prescription drugs, used as prescribed, do not destroy lives Obviously, you're not old enough to remember Elvis. And prescription drugs destroy far more lives than any illegal drug in existence.
294
posted on
12/12/2001 9:06:12 AM PST
by
Demidog
To: A.J.Armitage
Ping me when you post something like this if you don't mind. And good luck tomorrow--it should be a cakewalk, with the way the choice of questions is set up.
295
posted on
12/12/2001 9:07:43 AM PST
by
Pistias
To: Demidog
And prescription drugs destroy far more lives than any illegal drug in existence.Are you high?! That is the most ridiculous post I have seen in many months. Almost as ridiculous as the idiots that have said that Iraq is not a threat. Funny both statements came from Liberaltarians.
To: Texaggie79
I'm not high. You're ignorant of the facts.
297
posted on
12/12/2001 9:19:13 AM PST
by
Demidog
Comment #298 Removed by Moderator
To: TBP
Ya if we legalized drugs these guys would shut up and get out of our faces with all of this cr@p, might be worth it.
To: Demidog
LOL, then show me your facts. I will only except impartial sources, since you guys refuse any facts from the DOJ.
Show me how many hard criminals are in jail that perpetrated their crime while on prescribed drugs.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 361-379 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson