Posted on 09/24/2001 6:34:22 AM PDT by ChaseR
As of this past July 9th, 2001, Meng vs Schwartz - 98cv2859 Judge Lamberth denied a motion to alter judgement, denied a motion to amend judgement and denied a motion for relief of judgement in the Loral Shareholders case. - As of today, July 19, 2001, I'm starting this Loral Shareholders 'Discussion' Thread to make sure this Loral case stays in the spotlight (Latest Posts) for discussion purposes and for all future FR.com posters and lurkers to easily find.
I'm highlighting one of the key defendents, Terrance McAuliffe - because he is now Chairman of the DNC. Yesterday, on MSNBC Hardball, one of their guests was McAuliffe and just before he went off the air -he quickly made sure every viewer heard - that it was the Republicans who did not allow Campaign Finance Reform to make it to the Floor for a vote. But, who was the man who was a key defendent in this Loral Shareholders aiding and abetting espionage case?? TERRANCE McAULIFFE! And which party readily accepted 1.4 million in cash from Bernard Schwartz, the head of Loral? The DEMOCRAT PARTY! And which President allowed Johnny Chung, John Huang and Charlie Trie into the White House with hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Communist Chinese Army?? President Willaim Jefferson Clinton!
So, let's not delay. Let's not let McAuliffe and the DNC get away with fooling the public about - who took/takes the cash!
(I appeal to everyone to post and/or bump these informative threads as often as you can.)
where is the truth?
Supposedly?
-BTTT-...justice doesn't supposedly occur; it MUST be a fact of life in the United States of America in Y2k+1.
Gov. Ridge may not have been my favorite pick for Dubyuh's Veep...but he's always struck me as the Law & Order Type!! I hope yer Right!!
FReegards...MUD
The SDNY is puitting on a better defense for Carey than Carey's own Reid Weingarten
though all indictable by MoJo, Susan Davis, Aaron Belk and Bob Mullenkampf all testified as gov't witnesses!
They gave Carey three b-jobs in a row.
Observers say it's all over but the crying.
Carey is another Jackie Presser and the Govt. will cover for him at all cost
Mo Jo is tanking
Let's see:
Mary Jo has to stay on as USA because she was on the 1st wtc bombing (and now she will get the 2nd)...
then she replaces Rice & Beaman (AUSAs on Hamilton) on the Carey trial .. for a rookie
the fix is in
but I've already said that
.
Yea; you said that, alright.
But...as long as the wench "is tanking"?
Regardless the reason(s); she should be terminated by Justice just as soon as humanly possible.
The current WTC debacle is new enough she needn't be involved in the prosecution thereof & a newcomer will be able to do the job quite nicely.
For the record, I'm sickened & pray you're wrong about this.
But I've read your musings long enough to know you rarely (never) commit an error.
.
that's why Jackie Presser's handler Willie Webster is on IRB
.
Sadly, Ashcroft is not any better than Reno seeking justice on any corruption matter. He is also working overtime attempting to be politcally correct.
Which is why in part anyway, I say JD must take the opportunity now to dump this imbecile.
Should Bush's JD lead by JAshcroft fail to do so?
They're going to leave themselves open for an awful lot of critical speculation as to why they didn't, & cripple their already shaky credibility; starting with mine.
I'd like to think I've extended this POTUS & his appointees every possible consideration & benefit of the doubt up to now; especially in light of recent events.
Although I shall continue my undivided support, it'll be done so with a very jaded eye.
Just this hoot2 - please help keep it bumped...and ping your friends, thanks. US Congress Subpoena Orders Ashcroft To Release Clinton Evidence on Sept. 11, 2001 - Re-Post
Absolutley. The Rule of Law must prevail!
Looks that way. :(
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.