[Zviadist]

Following the moderators guidelines, you should be banned for your name alone.

Absolutely. And adding in his abusive language, repeated calls for violence and racism, and idiotic posting of pictures of atomic bombs with calls for their use against civilian populations, I honestly cannot understand why this poster has not been banned. And, to top it off, he only just registered a couple of weeks ago.

Let the neo-cons have their place here, flexing their armchair muscles and whimpering about the glories of empire, but then they cross the line, as this poster does on a daily basis, they should be warned and eventually banned just like the other side gets banned.

[Nuke'm Glowing]

And since you obviously have not read ANY or all of my posts, I am quite glad you are not in charge. I have never posted any nuclear detonation photos, nor advocated the use against of nuclear weapons against civilian targets. I only propose using tactical nukes against hardened military targets to save American soldiers from the trap of fighting in the mountains our enemies call home. If you're that sensitive to my screen name, obviously you have not read the thousands of others similar to and thinking the same way I do.

[Osinski]

Yeah, well I haven't been totally pacifist in my upset either, so some of my posts have been a little over the top. The point however seems to be the discussion of issues surounding the state of our country, the actions of our leaders, and the deeper reasoning to determine that the decisions being made are in our and our country's best interests. So much has happened and is happening. People are upset. The news is predominating on war and possible threats to our national security at home. People are upset and on edge. The issue of the stock market collapse seems distant and somewhat trivial compared to people's sense of survival, yet pieces that I read make me wonder about the interconnectedness of this whole shebang.

Are there other unidentified players in this drama?