Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Cost of Life (Clinton/Gore Sellout of Security for Campaign Contributions) **FR EXCLUSIVE** #3
Thread Two ^ | 9/23/01 | Jon Loose and Connie Hair

Posted on 09/23/2001 7:00:47 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar

One last time in Breaking News, then the news outlets are on their own! LOL


At the invitation of UPI, Jon Loose and I wrote this op-ed and submitted it a week ago. UPI told us that every single person who read it there said that this was not commentary but that it was news. They have told us they were assigning staff to cover this story.

Since Newsmax has broken the story, I thought it time to put out information that has not yet come to light.


The Cost of Life
By Jon Loose and Connie Hair

Hindsight is always 20/20. You see causes and proactive avenues that could have altered the outcome. Sometimes these ignored actions are discounted as unreasonable. Other times, you point your finger at a deserved party.

In the wake of the terrorist attack on the United States on September 11, 2001, the most compelling raison d'être is that we failed to take our own advice. More specifically, the weaknesses in airport security were largely identified a number of years ago.

In July of 1996, in the wake of the crash of TWA flight 800, President Clinton convened the White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security by executive order 13015 to take place on August 22, 1996. He gave the commission 45 days to “study matters involving aviation safety and security, including air traffic control and to develop a strategy to improve aviation safety and security, both domestically and internationally,” then present their conclusions. He named Vice President Al Gore to head the commission. By special invitation of the President, Victoria Cummock was named to the commission. Ms. Cummock lost her husband in the explosion of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scottland some eight years prior. According to Newsday, Cummock held the reputation at the time of “the airlines’ most tenacious foe.”

Five years prior to September 11, 2001, Gore held a press conference to announce the commission’s preliminary report that promised, “to take the strongest measures possible to reduce the risk of terrorism and sabotage to airline passengers and crews.” Gore further stated that their upcoming proposed measures will, “be put into place quickly and effectively and will help ensure that airline travel remains as safe as possible for all travelers.” A solid and factual preliminary report backed up Gore’s comments.

Ten days later, just prior to the 1996 election, Gore penned a letter to airline lobbyist Carol Hallett, promising that the commission's findings would not cause the airlines any loss of revenue. The very next day the Democratic National Committee received a check in the amount of $40,000 from TWA. Over the next two weeks Northwest, United and American Airlines donated $55,000 more.

In the next two months the Democratic National Committee pocketed over $250,000 from American Airlines. United Airlines threw in an additional $100,000. Northwest Airlines added $53,000. That’s a grand total of over half a million dollars. According to the Washington Times, Whitehouse Spokesman, Ginny Terzano gave no denial when asked whether Al Gore solicited these airline donations personally.

Contributory advice and suggestions were being sought and incorporated into the draft(s) of the report by all sides of the aisle and divisions of government including intelligence agencies, transportation agencies and military personnel. The draft final form was presented to the 21 participating commissioners in January of 1997. According to the Washington Times, a significant number of security measures were removed from the proposed final draft of the report.

Victoria Cummock and CIA Director John Deutch were resolute in their opposition to the “softball” report. Gore was given no choice but to pull back the report. Reinstalled were sensible new procedures that would cost the airlines millions of dollars.

· Conduct airport vulnerability assessments and develop action plans
· Require criminal background checks and FBI fingerprint checks for all screeners, and all airport and airline employees with access to secure areas
· Deploy existing technology
· Signifi cantly expand the use of bomb-sniffing dogs
· Complement technology with automated passenger profiling
· Certify screening companies and improve screener performance
· Aggressively test existing security systems
· Use the Customs Service to enhance security
· Give properly cleared airline and airport security personnel access to the classified information they need to know
· Begin implementation of full bag-passenger match
· Providing more compassionate and effective assistance to families of victims
· Improve passenger manifests
· Significantly increase the number of FBI agents assigned to counter-terrorism investigations, to improve intelligence, and to crisis response
· Provide anti-terrorism assistance in the form of airport security training to countries where there are airports served by airlines flying to the US

The security measures were in the final recommendation report. However, the implementation timetable was nowhere to be found.

In February of 1997, Victoria Cummock called the report “toothless.” She informed Gore that unless specific implementation dates were added in the report she would file a dissent, because the airline industry would not have to do anything until such measures were mandated.

On February 12, 1997, an open meeting was held on the commission’s final report. Gore made a point to inform Ms. Cummock that he would leave room for her dissent to the final report. NBC Dateline caught these comments on videotape. Also on videotape was Mr. Gore presenting the final report to President Clinton minutes later and pronouncing that the report had unanimous consent. But it didn’t.

Victoria Cummock filed suit claiming that Gore pressured her to abandon her call for counter-terrorist measures, the right to see commission files of which she was denied, and the right to file her 42-page dissent. It was her ambition to see the commission’s findings presented accurately within the final report. Gore painted Cummock, who had lost her husband in a terrorist act, as a disgruntled commissioner.

In mid 1999 Ms. Cummock won her case in the D.C. Court of Appeals. In the long drawn out and impeded discovery process a memo was discovered from a CIA staffer, specializing in psychological profiling. According to The American Spectator, the memo stated that Cummock could be "kept in line if she believes progress could be made" but "could become a major problem."

On September 11, 2001, those ultimately responsible for the destruction of thousands of precious lives were the terrorists who pulled the knives and steered the planes.

But playing politics and intentionally ignoring obvious safety and security voids in an industry that has been a target of terrorists for over thirty years is unconscionable.

Now the airlines are paying the price. We all are.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Editorial
KEYWORDS: espionagelist; govwatch; terrorwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last
To: Clinton's a liar
Outstanding work, Connie and Jon!! Please, God, let this get out in the lamestream media ... has O'Reilly got this?
21 posted on 09/23/2001 7:35:09 PM PDT by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Thanks for the heads up! I read the thread, but I plan to bookmark it and read it over again. It is full of information. Great Work, Cal!!!!
22 posted on 09/23/2001 7:36:00 PM PDT by buffyt (BarneyFrank/BClinton/AGore/GCondit/HillaryR/JReno ~ the faces of the Democratic party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
My friend says hi. She may turn out to be a Freeper yet. She first has to learn how to operate the puter LOL. Same here with the clinton images. I've tried to avoid looking at them, but it's almost impossible. Just like today when I was watching the prayer service. You couldn't miss their ugly mugs right behind the podium, with the hillbilly posing for the cameras. Where are you tonight? In L.A.?
23 posted on 09/23/2001 7:39:04 PM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
O'Reilly had Victoria Cummock on his show last week. I'm not sure how much of a conversation they had before the show, and she may have been holding back (as well as O'Reilly) for a more appropriate time to start pointing fingers. It wouldn't hurt to e-mail O'Reilly. I'm hoping he's already on this!

Thank you for the kind words for both me and Jon.

24 posted on 09/23/2001 7:41:16 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: buffyt
Thanks, BuffMom! Nita Nupress posted some of her own research on threads one and two! You might wanna check those out, as well!

God bless.

25 posted on 09/23/2001 7:42:20 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RevNan
I can take the Clintons' smug looks and posturing -- as long as I don't have to hear they say anything!

No, I'm an East Coaster for the time being, my friend!

26 posted on 09/23/2001 7:43:55 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Bump!
27 posted on 09/23/2001 7:47:27 PM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Rectification bump!
28 posted on 09/23/2001 7:51:20 PM PDT by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Hiya, Incorrigible! Thank you for the bump!
29 posted on 09/23/2001 7:53:28 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rintense, mtngrl
Justice and Retribution BTT!!!!!
30 posted on 09/23/2001 7:53:43 PM PDT by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RevNan
Anybody got stills of her refusing to sing the national anthem?
31 posted on 09/23/2001 7:54:19 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
Hey, you! Thank you for the bump! We must rectify! LOL Isn't there a song in there somewhere?
32 posted on 09/23/2001 7:54:26 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Bump for reading Nita's posts.
33 posted on 09/23/2001 7:55:22 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas, hole_n_one
hole_n_one is the resident screen capture FReeper! I'm constantly amazed at how many screen captures hole_n_one posts! Let's see if we get a response!
34 posted on 09/23/2001 7:56:27 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Leg irons and orange jumpsuits bump!
35 posted on 09/23/2001 7:57:05 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Terrific piece. And we thought Clinton's stench couldn't get worse after pardongate. Is there no end to the destructiveness of the Clinton Crime Family?
36 posted on 09/23/2001 8:02:49 PM PDT by HateBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HateBill
Hiya, HateBill! Thanks for bumping by!

The stench remains. If only those little paper masks would help us!

37 posted on 09/23/2001 8:04:36 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Great post. You've found history's MARKED grave of discarded lies!
38 posted on 09/23/2001 8:05:40 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer
Thanks, JohnBovenmyer! And thank you for that most appropriate play on President Bush's quote! Excellent!
39 posted on 09/23/2001 8:09:03 PM PDT by Clinton's a liar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Don't mention it. I plan on bumping the night away.

I'm thinking ... but Doug from Upland has more of a gift in the song department.

40 posted on 09/23/2001 8:10:20 PM PDT by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson