As far as your lame reference to Revelations 17: 1-6, how many times do you and other neo-Christians need to go to that well to know its dry? I mean really, with all you knowledge of the Bible I would think that you could come up with something other than the tired old Whore of Babylon thing. But in case you some how missed it go Here for some insight.
You need a new hobby, try duck hunting; its quite invigorating.
I don't have interest in getting further embroiled in these controversies with RCs, but I am aware that others might. As I indicated earlier, discussions of Romanism are a strictly minor interest on my part.
I am more concerned about the apostasies of today's Protestants.
(On the other hand, I would point out that Revelations 17:1-6 does fit Romanism as drunk on the blood of literally millions of martyrs.)