Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: proud2bRC
I'll just post a few comments here from other threads:

1) An inalienable right to life, from conception to natural death, is the foundational principle upon which all other rights and freedoms are predicated. Ridge is pro-abortion. Therefore I fear he will not respect all our other rights, which flow from our inalienable right to life. (My own standard response. If you don't get this concept, God help us all--Proud2brc)

2) Abortion is murder. Those who support abortion, support murder. Supporters of murder are not only not fit for high public office, but they are also not fit for decent society, i.e., they should be shunned.

3) George W. Bush has claimed to be pro-life. (Of course, he's also perfectly willing to allow abortions in the case of rape or RU-486, so one can't put too much stock into what W. claims.) Yet, here he goes again, putting someone like Tom Ridge, who is publically in favor of protecting the murder of innocent children, into high office.

4) The pattern is clear to anyone who can crawl outside the box of two-party worldview. The Republicans can get away with making the unconstitutional, big-government changes that the Democrats can't. The Democrats then attain power and abuse the system that the Republicans have put in place for them. Meanwhile, they all get more powerful and more arrogant. While us serfs are expected to shut up, play by their rules and pay their friggin' bills.

5) picture this office run by a Clinton appointee. Say Reno. What if they decide that the REAL threat of domestic terrorism is "Armed Right Wing Extremists"? Think the BATF is rough now?

This office in the wrong hands is a potential disaster for our country. God help us if its ever run by a Beria or a Derzhinsky.

6) picture this office run by a Clinton appointee. Say Reno.....Gun-grabber Ridge is better than Reno. By how much, though?

42 posted on 09/21/2001 4:25:22 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: proud2bRC
I am with you on this one. If we as a nation are serious about protecting ourselves against terrorism, then let's start by protecting unborn babies from it. Muslim clerics point to the way we murder the unborn as proof that we as a nation are the great satan, morally weak, and vulnerable to defeat. By keeping these terrorist cells called abortion centers open we give aid and comfort to our enemies. These should be closed for the duration of our war against terrorism, a war which should begin at home. If we are going to be united in this war, let's include the unborn on our side and the God who hears their cries.
66 posted on 09/21/2001 5:11:16 PM PDT by Woodkirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: proud2bRC
Mr. Single Issue, did you know that Rudy Giuliani is pro-choice? I guess that makes him incapable of being mayor or presiding over the search and rescue missions in the WTC. I mean, he is against the lives of babies, so how can we expect him to give a damn about 5000 people buried in rubble.
124 posted on 09/21/2001 7:22:40 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson