In the Dallas Morning News yesterday, we had a letter to the editor from someone who said she could not
understand why we are morning 6,000+ dead in the WTC attack, when there are 4,000 abortions a day.
Amazing.
Also within the honorable pro-life movement are a few professional fundraisers who have only one goal, and that goal is not saving children.
In the Dallas Morning News yesterday, we had a letter to the editor from someone who said she could not understand why we are morning 6,000+ dead in the WTC attack, when there are 4,000 abortions a day.
Why is this amazing? Do different human beings have different value to you? Do we only mourn when the deaths happen in a clump, or when they are out of our control?
Human life is either valuable or it is not. How can you say that one person's criteria for "human enough to protect" is more valid than the next person's?
Bayoured, perhaps you could explain your non sequitor. Why do you presume, from what Storm Orphan posted of the letter, any other motive than concern for human life?