Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH APPOINTS PRO-ABORTION 'CATHOLIC' TO HEAD HOME SECURITY
LifeSite Daily News - September 21, 2001 ^ | September 21, 2001 | LifeSite Daily News

Posted on 09/21/2001 3:26:55 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM

BUSH APPOINTS PRO-ABORTION 'CATHOLIC' TO HEAD HOME SECURITY

WASHINGTON, September 21, 2001 (LSN.ca) - In the wake of the recent terrorist attacks in the United States, President George Bush announced last night the creation of a Cabinet-level position to head the new Office of Homeland Security. In a great disappointment to pro-lifers, Bush named notoriously pro-abortion Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge, to head the office.

Matt Abbott, director of public affairs for America's Pro-Life Action League told LifeSite, "If Ridge refuses to ensure the security of the most helpless citizens of his state - the unborn - how can he be expected to safeguard security for the nation?" Abbott also commented that Ridge is "a self-proclaimed Catholic while maintaining his strident pro-abortion position. What kind of principles does a person like that have? It makes you uncertain of such a person's leadership qualities."

See related coverage on the position and Ridge's pro-abortion stand:

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/htx/nm/20010920/ts/attack_bush_homeland_dc_2.html

http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/2001Mar/mar21for.htm


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-253 next last
To: proud2bRC
Which bill is it that Gov. Ridge voted for when he was a congressman that forced you to have an abortion. I must have missed this bill. What is it that you want? Do you want all pregnant women locked up and forced to bear children? Do you know what that sounds like?

It saddens me that women decide to kill their babies, but I can't force my morality on someone that doesn't want it. To do so makes me no better than the Taliban or the Nazis. The best I can do is educate and hope that the free will God gave us is used to support life.

101 posted on 09/21/2001 6:28:41 PM PDT by metalurgist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: jude24
I agree. Leave it up to the single issue fanatics to divide us against each other right when we need to unite as a nation the most.

As Bush said, if we are fighting for the principles of freedom we believe in, then we need to live by them.

Whether we disagree with others on issues like abortion we at least have the right to believe as we choose, and now face an enemy who would take away that freedom and destroy us in a second if they had the power.

It's hard to believe that some people are so wrapped up in themselves and their personal pet-peeves that the WTC terrorist attacks didn't wake them up.

And I agree that these single issue kooks more resemble the totalitarian intolerance of the Taliban than they do Americans at this moment.

102 posted on 09/21/2001 6:29:46 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All
What I don't understand is what makes him so qualified for this post, as opposed to say, Norman Schwarzkopf (sp?)? I don't know much about T. Ridge, can anyone elaborate on the special "skill set" that landed him this "job"?
103 posted on 09/21/2001 6:30:11 PM PDT by Aedammair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cap'n Crunch
Every country, since the beginning of time, has had abortions performed in it. As a matter of fact, most even had infanticides; some as religious rites. Only Japan has ever been nuked.

I'm not a Catholic, and no matter how much good Mother Theresa may have done, that was her opinion, and a directive from GOD.

104 posted on 09/21/2001 6:39:49 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Which should we fear most, a president that wants unlimited powers without dissention or those who would vest the president with unlimited powers and quell dissention?

Both sound like the fast track to a dictatorship.

105 posted on 09/21/2001 6:42:06 PM PDT by Lanman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
Ironic, isn't it, since abortion has killed a lot more Americans than terrorists have.
106 posted on 09/21/2001 6:51:19 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texlok
I don't think it will be under the present administration. It's the future...the slippery slope is real and slippery.
107 posted on 09/21/2001 6:53:09 PM PDT by beGlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Lanman
BTW, he's a gun grabber too.
Actually, Pennsylvania is pretty gun friendly.
108 posted on 09/21/2001 6:57:39 PM PDT by Hugh Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lodwick
Get out of my life, government! Thank you, JL

I agree. Even if you wished to take your 2 year old to your doctor and have him "put to sleep", that is no business of the gov. Hell, if we don't have a right to slaughter our own children, what rights DO we have? < /sarcasm>

109 posted on 09/21/2001 6:57:41 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: beGlad
Slippery slope all you want to ; however , we have a HUGE problem now. What are you suggestiong be done ? NOTHING ?

I guess that we need to all be so fearful of the future, that we are paralized to do anything now... right ?

110 posted on 09/21/2001 6:57:50 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

Comment #111 Removed by Moderator

To: proud2bRC
BFD!
112 posted on 09/21/2001 7:02:29 PM PDT by jwh_Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lanman
Homeland Defence must support the right to life
Because being a government official it is his job to upkeep the laws of the land, and unfortunately at this time abortion is legal, and his position will have no say on if it will remain legal, and as such his personal beliefs on abortion are meaningless to the discussion.
113 posted on 09/21/2001 7:02:51 PM PDT by Hugh Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #114 Removed by Moderator

To: nopardons
Yes, your right, it is Mother Teresas opinion, but it sure seems to be proving true. I happen to think it was more than just an opinion.

I know you will say I'm whacky but being catholic we believe we have a little more insight into these opinions. I'll give you an example or two. Just about every catholic knows that Our Lady appeared in Fatima in the early 20th century. When she did she foretold future events which came to pass, namely that the first world war would end and that if mankind did not change, Russia would become a great power and spread communism around the world. She also said a second world war would start and it would be worse than the first. Both things happened. Our Lady also said that if mankind didnt change there would be an "annihilation of nations." I dont think we have changed much, in fact I think we have gotten worse. I'm praying that we dont have an annihilation.

There have been numerous other prophetic statements by catholic saints throughout history. I've got a couple books containing same.

I dont expect you to believe it. I dont even mind being called a kook. But I believe it.

Some of the catholics here are aware that Sr. Faustina was recently canonized. The Church believes, and many of us believe, that Jesus and Mary had both appeared to this nun during the course of her life. She left a diary of the events detailing what Jesus and Mary told her. One of the things Jesus related to her was that the devotion which spread worldwide to the Divine Mercy was that this devotion would be mankinds last hope before His second coming, this was in the 1930's.

I'd say that many catholics here would also be able to speak of the appearance of Our Lady at Akita, Japan, where Our Ladys statue cried tears, and tears of blood and told about the coming chastisment because of mans sinfulness, this was in the 1970's.

I'm sure most non-catholics will think all of this fairy tales and start passing out the reynolds wrap for tinfoil wear but I for one believe it.

I believe Mother Teresa was a living saint, a prophet, like the prophets of the Old Testament, the ones the Jews didnt want to listen to.

115 posted on 09/21/2001 7:06:24 PM PDT by Cap'n Crunch (this ends this bit of hyperbole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
Ah, there's the rub...does no one here comprehend the long term ramifications of this appointment??? Ridge was not made VP in 2000 because the Republican party was not yet ready for a pro-abort candidate. Maybe by 2004 the Republican voters WILL be ready, especially if Cheney's heart gives out and Ridge becomes Bush's VP sooner.
Oh please, not this again.

I got so sick of this line of trying to undercut Bush by claiming he was going to go with a pro-abortion VP candidate during the year leading up to the election that I get nauseous at the idea of having to deal with this prattle again.

Bush considers himself pro-life, he chose a pro-life VP this time, and if he has to choose another, we have no reason to doubt he would choose another pro-lifer.

116 posted on 09/21/2001 7:06:36 PM PDT by Hugh Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
When all they can do is call you stupid, you know you're right and you know they know you're right. They're just too hard hearted and stiff necked to admit it.
117 posted on 09/21/2001 7:07:17 PM PDT by vigilo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: imberedux
He can't be trusted on the gun rights issue either.As a congreesman he ran pro gun then when he decided to run for governor he back stabbed the gun owners and voted for the assault weapon ban that was carried by TWO votes

Despite this action the NRA supported his bid for governor because he was the LESSER OF TWO EVILS and was greeted by a massive revolt among its membership in PA.. .

Will conservatives abandon Bush?

118 posted on 09/21/2001 7:07:36 PM PDT by Lanman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

Comment #119 Removed by Moderator

To: proud2bRC
I'd like to chime in to say: You..anti abortionist, protect the innocent unborn by blowing up clinics and let the protection of the Free World up to our leaders! Even though abortion is an important issue, there have GOT to be priorities. I'm against abortion but even more against being killed en mass (breathing humans) by some religious wacko from the other side of the world. Why don't you read up on some of their websites. Stop focusing on what is your "calling" (because it won't mean squat if they win) and expand your thinking about saving our freedom and our country. (big sigh and rolling of eyeballs)
120 posted on 09/21/2001 7:17:37 PM PDT by nagdt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-253 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson