[cantfindagoodscreenname]

Perhaps they are "feeling" for the women who are pregnant who lost their husbands and will be single moms now if they don't step in to save them. I can't even imagine what the rationale for this is now. I hope the report isn't true. How SICK can you get?

[gumbo]

Perhaps they are "feeling" for the women who are pregnant who lost their husbands and will be single moms now if they don't step in to save them. I can't even imagine what the rationale for this is now

That was my suspicion too.

If so, this is worse than a disservice to women who may be newly widowed, and who may very well profoundly regret a hasty decision to abort a child, made in the emotion of the moment.

[supercat]

Perhaps they are "feeling" for the women who are pregnant who lost their husbands and will be single moms now if they don't step in to save them.

Perhaps that's the rationalle, but I can't imagine it. I would think it far more likely that WTC widows who had been considering an abortion but didn't get one will now be glad they held off, and those who had gotten one will be in extreme regret.

[ArrogantBustard]

How SICK can you get?

It isn't sick. Sickening, perhaps, but not sick. These foul bastards at Planned Barrenhood know what they are doing. It's evil. E-V-I-L. Evil. Don't you feel a little better calling it by its right name?
You're welcome.

AB