I hear Ridge's pro-choice views being aired quite a bit in this thread. Logical question -- What does Ridge's abortion views have to do with his new position in Washington?
An inalienable right to life, from conception to natural death, is the foundational principle upon which all other rights and freedoms are predicated. Ridge is pro-abortion. Therefore I fear he will not respect all our other rights, which flow from our inalienable right to life.
I hear Ridge's pro-choice views being aired quite a bit in this thread. Logical question -- What does Ridge's abortion views have to do with his new position in Washington? It's very simple, Joe.
Abortion is murder. Those who support abortion, support murder. Supporters of murder are not only not fit for high public office, but they are also not fit for decent society, i.e., they should be shunned.
George W. Bush has claimed to be pro-life. (Of course, he's also perfectly willing to allow abortions in the case of rape or RU-486, so one can't put too much stock into what W. claims.) Yet, here he goes again, putting someone like Tom Ridge, who is publically in favor of protecting the murder of innocent children, into high office.
There, does that help?