Skip to comments.
US to take revenge without telling UN !
The Times ^
| 09/20/01
| ROLAND WATSON
Posted on 09/20/2001 2:26:20 PM PDT by Bald Eagle
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: Bald Eagle
I guess we should notify the UN of our ever move. We should give it our strike list and have it approved 48 hours prior to any action it will give the "innocent civilians" a chance to clear the area. (/sarcasm)
21
posted on
09/20/2001 3:14:59 PM PDT
by
R. Scott
Comment #22 Removed by Moderator
To: R. Scott
"I guess we should notify the UN of our ever move. We should give it our strike list and have it approved 48 hours prior to any action it will give the "innocent civilians" a chance to clear the area. (/sarcasm)"
Sarcasm noted, however the sad part is that whhat you have stated above is in fact true thanks to our media reporting every little move that we intend to make or that they think we intend to make...at least Bush was smart enough to start blacking out the media on national security moves. I say we put Tom Blowchow and some of the other left wing media liberals in an unarmed jeep clearly marked with USA emblems and send it dashing through afghanistan as our boys watch to find out where the little suckers are hiding.
To: piasa
The UN already laid waste to the last bit of credibility they had with that absurdity of a meeting on racism in Durban.On the contrary, they established their "credibility" perfectly when SecGen failed to abort that kangaroo session.
24
posted on
09/20/2001 3:25:18 PM PDT
by
Diojneez
To: Bald Eagle
Top Ten Reason's not to work with the UN: (should be on the Letterman Show but isn't).
10. Blue Helmets that can be seen at and shot from 1000 yds.
9. UN Durban conference was as full of anti US/Jew hatred as the Taliban.
8. Peacekeeper just sounds like a wussie.
7. Would have to see Madeline UNbright's ugly face on TV every other hour.
6. We pay them billions of dollars a year to things that we can do ourselves.
5. 4. and 3. Somalia, Kosovo, and Korea
2. The possibility of being under the command of the French who've been on a losing streak since Waterloo.
and the number one reason for not working with the UN. 1. THEY'RE THE UN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: Jason, from Columbus Ohio
bushtheelder didn't do jack unless it was cleared by the u.n. I guess we'll see if bushtheyounger lets dad do his thinking.
To: Bald Eagle
AMERICA will exact military revenge on terrorists for years to come without consulting the United NationsI wouldn't tell them anything. The whole operation would undoubtably become compromised.
To: Bald Eagle
Good. Now if only we could get the U.S. to take their frustrations out but burying the U.N.
29
posted on
09/20/2001 3:57:42 PM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
(cold@gateway.net)
To: Bald Eagle
ITs a nice title for an article but is it really the start of a break away from the UN?I think people are wising up. How much remains to be seen.
To: Jason, from Columbus Ohio
bump
To: enderwiggnz
if we're going to do this, it has to be done .properly.You're a really funny guy.
To: Bald Eagle
"However, the White Houses rejection of the need for future UN consent." A step in the correct direction. The UN represents the enemies of this country. Get the US out of the UN!
33
posted on
09/20/2001 4:03:50 PM PDT
by
blam
To: Bald Eagle
And we all know how effective the UN is considering the wonderful job they did it averting the massacre in Rwanda, NOT!!!!!
34
posted on
09/20/2001 4:04:31 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Bald Eagle
It's not vengeance. The Commander In Chief and staff recognize it's time to kill in self-defense; for national security. Godspeed to them and our military.
To: Bald Eagle
To: Bald Eagle
Great news!
You would think that we would have learned thirty years ago when we filled in the UN "security council" on our plans in Vietnam, only to have the "security council" tip off the NVA.
To: Bald Eagle
Oh, I'd just be sick if they started talking
bad about us at the U.N. ..
(/sarcasm)
Comment #39 Removed by Moderator
To: pulaskibush
"2. The possibility of being under the command
of the French who've been on a losing streak since Waterloo"
Don't even think it!!!
Freakin' surrender monkeys...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson