Posted on 09/20/2001 2:26:20 PM PDT by Bald Eagle
| US to take revenge without telling UN |
| FROM ROLAND WATSON IN WASHINGTON |
| AMERICA will exact military revenge on terrorists for years to come without consulting the United Nations, Washington made clear yesterday as it suggested that the 19 hijackers had been supported by several states. Donald Rumsfeld, the Defence Secretary, insisted on the United States’s right to a free hand when it came to force in the pursuit of individuals, networks and states implicated in the loss of more than 5,000 lives. President Bush used a fresh tack to try to persuade Arab states traditionally wary of dealing with America to co-operate. He said they could share information with Washington covertly and their citizens would never know. However, the White House’s rejection of the need for future UN consent raised concerns that Mr Bush was heading for immediate diplomatic trouble as he tries to piece together a shifting, multilayered pattern of alliances to support a global battle with terrorism lasting years. China has said that it believes firm evidence should be laid before the UN before any military action. Russia has yet to show its hand on the issue, but US diplomats fear that Moscow will demand thorough discussion at the UN Security Council, where it holds a veto. In another day of hectic diplomatic activity, Mr Bush met Megawati Sukarnoputri, President of Indonesia, the most populous Muslim country. Sitting side by side, he extended a new offer to leaders in Arab states, saying he would respect their local sensitivities in dealing with the US. Although some moderate Middle Eastern countries such as Saudi Arabia have sympathised with the US after last week’s attacks, none has agreed to co-operate fully. Mr Bush said he understood that some countries would be nervous of being seen to deal with their traditional foe. “I understand that,” he said, adding that they could share information in private. The President said: “This will be a different kind of battle, a series of battles. They will be fought visibly sometimes, and sometimes we’ll never see what may be taking place. “We fully understand that some nations will be comfortable supporting overt activities, some nations will be comfortable supporting covert activities, some nations will only be comfortable in providing information. Others will be helpful and only feel comfortable helping on financial matters.” Washington widened its list of possible culprits yesterday, saying it believed that more than one overseas government may have supported the suicide hijackers. John Ashcroft, the Attorney General, said it was “pretty clear” that a “variety of foreign governments” were involved in supporting and protecting “the networks that conduct these kind of events”. Mr Ashcroft, visiting the blackened rubble of the Pentagon, said that those governments should understand that “America will not tolerate that kind of support”. American intelligence suspects a possible Iraqi link to last week’s attacks, based on a meeting between Mohammed Atta, the hijacker believed to be at the controls of the first jet to smash into the World Trade Centre, and the head of Bagdhad’s intelligence service earlier this year. But Mr Ashcroft pointedly referred to governments in the plural. |
Sarcasm noted, however the sad part is that whhat you have stated above is in fact true thanks to our media reporting every little move that we intend to make or that they think we intend to make...at least Bush was smart enough to start blacking out the media on national security moves. I say we put Tom Blowchow and some of the other left wing media liberals in an unarmed jeep clearly marked with USA emblems and send it dashing through afghanistan as our boys watch to find out where the little suckers are hiding.
On the contrary, they established their "credibility" perfectly when SecGen failed to abort that kangaroo session.
10. Blue Helmets that can be seen at and shot from 1000 yds.
9. UN Durban conference was as full of anti US/Jew hatred as the Taliban.
8. Peacekeeper just sounds like a wussie.
7. Would have to see Madeline UNbright's ugly face on TV every other hour.
6. We pay them billions of dollars a year to things that we can do ourselves.
5. 4. and 3. Somalia, Kosovo, and Korea
2. The possibility of being under the command of the French who've been on a losing streak since Waterloo.
and the number one reason for not working with the UN. 1. THEY'RE THE UN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I wouldn't tell them anything. The whole operation would undoubtably become compromised.
I think people are wising up. How much remains to be seen.
You're a really funny guy.
A step in the correct direction. The UN represents the enemies of this country. Get the US out of the UN!
UN to Taliban over the years, "can't we all just get along.": Clinton's final gift to GW?Dec.20, 2000...give us Osama in 30 days (inaugeration day) or else! Tough talk, little action. Osama yawned.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.