Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: x
Hmmm.

You're an incrementalist, then? I wouldn't have thought so from some of your previous posts.

I'm very pleased that the President has bided his time before responding, but I'm hoping for a total overwhelming reponse once he is ready.

27 posted on 09/20/2001 3:25:48 PM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: cicero's_son
The response should be hard and forceful. That's true. I don't think we ought to get involved in any Vietnam style incrementalism. I just hope we have realizable goals and an end strategy.

Hanson is too in love with the idea of total victory and transforming other societies. National Review is right about the need for force now, but their advice may involve making too many enemies in the hope of ultimate victory.

Still it's a tough call. You don't want to leave your actual enemy crippled and liable to strike again, but you don't want to destroy so much that you make more enemies for the future.

31 posted on 09/20/2001 10:03:29 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson