Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longshadow, PatrickHenry
In as much as PH has already posted material that indicates the Taliban rejects Evolution, ...

Really? I didn't catch that. PH?

30 posted on 09/22/2001 2:44:23 PM PDT by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: jennyp, longshadow
It was post 19, but it was the "moderate" Saudis, not the Taliban. Longshadow jumped the gun, due to my remarks about creationism and the Taliban, but I have no source. Not yet. Nevertheless, if the Saudis are against evolution, can there be any doubt about the Taliban?
31 posted on 09/22/2001 3:01:05 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: jennyp
I thought PH had found such a connection and posted it on another thread, but I could be mistaken.

It matters not.

From this thread, we have this statement from Saudi authorities:

"It also said the game contradicted Islamic teachings by promoting Darwin's theory of evolution [snip]"

Given that the Saudi's are LESS strict in their fundamentalist fervor, as evidenced by their throwing Osama bin Laden out of the country, than the Taliban, who welcomed bin Laden to Afghanistan, it is axiomatic that if the Saudi's say Darwin contradicts Islamic teaching, the Taliban certainly isn't going to embrace old Charlie and his ideas.

32 posted on 09/22/2001 3:03:50 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson