I read it, and it was only the usual doubletalk about some people say that Behe is wrong, etc., etc. but it did not show any refutation of what he said. In other words, it was just some more inane blather.
I patiently await your refutation of the three journal articles I cited which are living contradictions of key predictions in Behe's book. Obviously, you haven't, in fact, read what you are defending, have you?
I patiently await your alternative explanation as to how oil companies search for oil.
You can wait a long time. If you have proof - you post it here. I will not do your work for you. I post my proof right here where everyone can see it.
The truth of the matter is that you have no proof, you do not even have the names of the articles. You are a total phony who has completely lost the argument and are lying. If there were such articles and they had refutations, you would have given the refutations right here.
Evloutinists like evolution itself always say the proof is somewhere else. Like McCarthy they have the proof right in their hands - but will not tell it to anyone.