Biology and astronomy have nothing to do with each other, you cannot even find a proper example to compare the lameness of evolution to any real science. Astronomy is a science because it can predict many things, has equations which can be used in its work, can predict the motion of planets and has been proven by both experiments and practical use. Evolution cannot lay claim to any of those scientific proofs.
This is high gibberish. Evolutionary micro-biology satisfies every criteria you have specified. See my previous answer to Phaedrus. AND, there is no such thing as proof in natural sciences, if there is, could you kindly point me to the proof of the theory of gravity? Your hangup on this subject is not helping you think very clearly, as witness your absurd statement here about astronomy and biology.
I read it, and it was only the usual doubletalk about some people say that Behe is wrong, etc., etc. but it did not show any refutation of what he said. In other words, it was just some more inane blather.
AND, there is no such thing as proof in natural sciences,
Of course there is. That is why we have electric light bulbs, automobiles, televisions and space ships. They are living proof of scientific theory. Evolution cannot give proof for one simple reason: evolution is not science.