Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Thorne
It's true. They also had to do it this way to take the beatings from launches and recoveries on aircraft carriers, especially the landings. The A6 is a very heavy plane for carrier operations and combined with the large payloads it carried, a conventional airframe would have failed in short order.
30 posted on 09/20/2001 11:30:07 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: connectthedots
Far be it from me to contradict a fellow FReeper, but the A-6 "Intruder," was not "machined out of a solid block of a high-strength aluminum alloy." It had many parts that were, but it was of conventional aircraft construction with the usual welds, fasteners and rivets.

It was a "durable aircraft and could withstand tremendous damage and still fly" because it was designed and built by the world famous "Grumman Iron Works," a company noted for building hell-for-strong aircraft for the U.S. Navy since before WWII.

The A-6, as are all aircraft destined for service in a U.S. Navy Carrier Air Wing, was specifically designed for that extremely harsh environment, plus the combat environement, of course. All carrier-based aircraft are substantially heavier than aircraft designed only for land operations.

Grumman built fine airplanes for the U.S. Navy, and I am proud to have flown them from 1965 until 1981. We made fun of them, but, damn, they could "take a licking and keep on flying!"

Frank L. Davis, Jr.
Captain, USNR (Ret)
Naval Aviator # V23271

34 posted on 10/30/2001 7:03:52 AM PST by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson