Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KC Burke
There is a serious question about thinking the the Taliban alone are the sponsers of bin Laden. The tentacles of this evil run deep.

If other countries are directly behind it, we should go after them, but we shouldn't attack a country just because terrorists use it as a staging area. After all, they use the United States as a staging area. Uriel has a very good idea, which is apparently on its way to being proposed as legislation: bring back letters of marque and reprisal, which would mean groups authorised by the letters killing members of the terrorist network(or turning them in, if inside the United States) for bounties. The thread's here.

As Bush has given us the impression that he doesn't want a "show" war involving a two million dollar missle against a 10 dollar tent

And that's a good thing.

55 posted on 09/17/2001 8:27:19 PM PDT by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: A.J.Armitage
The great danger facing us now is that we will act rashly, and instead of bringing war to the Taliban, turning Islam into the enemy...

I agree. Recruitment is also a MAJOR concern for terrorists. Finding suicide bombers isn't all that easy. Rash moves however can only aid bin Laden types in their efforts to bring in other wise moderate haters of the US.

It also helps him show the moderate leaders in the middle east to be unable and unwilling to fight the west. Bin Laden becomes the sole resource for the radical looking for expression.
As always, I am grateful for your essays.

57 posted on 09/17/2001 9:49:45 PM PDT by arimus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson