Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex, A.J. Armitage
Under any meaningful foreign policy we would recognize that Israel and West Europe are better allies than, say, Iraq and China;

Is it possible that we don't need allies with whom to have mutual defense pacts, but merely friends with whom we cooperate when it serves mutual purpose to do so? How many of our "allies" do we really confidently expect will act on our behalf when it is not in their own current interest to do so?

Maybe alliances should be made at the moment when needed and only for the purpose and duration of the current need for cooperation.

41 posted on 09/17/2001 5:08:43 PM PDT by LSJohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: LSJohn
Maybe alliances should be made at the moment when needed and only for the purpose and duration of the current need for cooperation.

We never need Israel to defend us, say, form Canada, so the relationship is not symmetrical. It is not in our interest to have a new Mongol Horde roll over Israel and Europe, so it becomes in our interest to have alliances with these nations that are of significant duration. Unless there is durability to the alliance, the small countries that we don't want to succumb one by one will seek separate deals with the Horde and won't provide a united front, which we do need.

50 posted on 09/17/2001 7:36:53 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: LSJohn
Maybe alliances should be made at the moment when needed and only for the purpose and duration of the current need for cooperation.

Uh...because that's not an alliance?

60 posted on 09/18/2001 12:16:15 AM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson