[Biblebelter]

This writer made some sobering points that the talking heads won't be slobbering over themselves on the idiot box. To those I would like to add some points of my own.

This nation from top to bottom does not have a clue to what national security truly means.

I am for openness in government, but when it comes to national security there must be secrecy and discipline. Of course we must elect some people to office with moral character so that they will not claim national security to cover up their own criminality or depravity.

We may be a nation of laws but there is no need to hamstring ourselves with international law and world courts when operating off our shores.

The reality of the present situation requires that we have an intelligence service of trained killers and kidnappers who covertly operate off our shores.

If we could, our best course of action now, would be to take out anyone we could find on the face of the earth who has had contact with the terrorist network.

Sure it makes a statement to bomb 19th century Afghanistan back to the 16th century.

But in this new war it is better and more efficient to operate in the dark than in the light of international wall to wall TV coverage. A dead unknown terrorist serves our purpose better than one who is known and headed for martyrdom among the millions looking for destruction of our civilization.

We have no evidence that these terrorists carry weapons or are trained to defend themselves against highly trained killers.

The terrorists who are of greatest threat to us are not the ones in Syria, Iraq, or Palestine. Those terrorists cannot get into our country directly from those terrorists states. They must nest and enter from an ally.

We should be doing some kidnapping and killing of potential terrorists when they are in these states supposedly friendly to us.

There are rumors that some terrorists have fled to Mexico. How difficult would it be to kidnap and dispose of them while they were in Mexico? It is not after all like kidnapping and murder is a rare occurence in Mexico.

Of course such actions goes against the panseyhood so acutely identified by the author in his article.

[ConvictHitlery]

If the leaders of our country would have the balls and wisdom of Golda Meir or Mme Thatcher, we would invade not Libya, but the Arabic peninsula.

You need to know why ?

1. It is in the best interest of the United States.
2. It is very easy to accomplish.
2. All terrorist actions were financed with money originated fron the Saudis.
3. To solve forever the vital oil supply for the whole world.