I'm sure you meant to say that you would make every effort to ensure that all innocent women and children were removed, first...right? That you wouldn't really intend to condemn people just because they happened to be born in a particular country, or professed a particular set of beliefs...but otherwise had absolutely nothing in common with those who perpetrated that foul deed on the WTC?Congressman Andrews just stated on Fox News Channel that the nuclear response remains a viable option.Turn the nation's that harbor these people to glass.
11 Posted on 09/13/2001 23:00:11 PDT by Stingray [ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]
Otherwise, you would only be showing your true colors as a foul, low-life, mouth-breathing, bigoted hypocrite.
You have been hammering the same selective quotes on a dozen or more threads, hoping to stir people to hate 'them rag-heads' as much as you do, implying the same kind of mindless 'guilt by association' which you so heartily condemn, and are simply too blind or stupid to see the moral equivalence.
You make such a fine, paragon exemplar of 'christian' virtue, stingray.
Tell that to the Germans bombed at Dresden. Tell that to the Japanese firebombed in Tokyo. Tell that to the Japanese nuked in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I'm sure we will try to spare as many innocent lives as possible, but if these cowards are hiding behind them, as they do in the West Bank and Gaza, where they send children out to throw stones at tanks and APC's, then innocents will die and no amount of your misguided, self-deluded liberal panty-waisted handwringing and pants-wetting is going to change that.
And yes, you are still a liar and a loser.
Your attack on him suggests that he is just that.