Posted on 09/15/2001 12:48:34 PM PDT by LarryLied
Hot to present themselves as staunch flag-waggers, some of America's premier environmental organizations have disgracefully ditched their principles.
The Sierra Club, America's oldest green group has abruptly turned off its campaign against the anti-environmental program of the Bush administration. CounterPunch has secured an internal memo in which the club's high command explains to its staff why it suspending its campaigns.
"In response to the attacks on America," the memo goes, "we are shifting our communications strategy for the immediate future. We have taken all of our ads off of the air; halted our phone banks; removed any material from the web that people could perceive as anti-Bush, and we are taking other steps to prevent the Sierra Club from being perceived as controversial during this crisis. For now we are going to stop aggressively pushing our agenda and will cease bashing President Bush."
The memo then instructs club staffers on how to respond to the press: "If you are asked about what this terrorism does to the Sierra Club's agenda, please respond simply by saying that right now the public needs to focus on comforting each other and strengthening our national security to deal with the crisis at hand."
Imagine if this craven posture spreads across the public interest movement. We could expect First Amendment defenders to say that they were abandoning efforts to protect the Bill of Rights. We could expect groups defending immigrants to say that henceforth the INS should be given free rein. Fortunately First Amendment defenders and defenders of immigrants have stronger spines and principles than the supposed defenders of the environment at the Sierra Club.
Are we now to expect the Club to endorse drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve as necessary "for national security"?
Even groups that we here at CounterPunch have admired are now in pellmell cowardly retreat.
The Berkeley-based International Rivers Network, which has been the main bulwark against the Three Gorges dam in China, now announces that it is suspending its planned nationwide protest against Morgan Stanley, one of the dam's principle financiers. Morgan Stanley had 50 floors of offices in the World Trade Center. IRN has also announced that "out of respect for the victims of this disaster, with understanding of the strategic difficulties in conveying to a shocked media and public our messages regarding the World Bank and IMF, with concern for the integrity of security systems in Washington DC, and for the safety of all, we will refrain from participating in activities surrounding the planned World Bank / IMF this month. We are also sharing our concerns with the leading organizations responsible for planning and coordinating these activities."
The Ruckus Society, the direct action training group involved in many demonstrations at the World Trade Organization has simultaneously announced that it is canceling its training camp, to be held in Middleburgh, Virginia, scheduled as preparation for the next World Bank meeting.
This camp was to be cosponsored by the Institute for Policy Studies, Jobs with Justice and Global Exchange. All these organizations have now backed out, saying that now is not the time for such activity.
The Rainforest Action Network, based in San Francisco, describes itself as being in a "wait-and-see mode."
"Things are definitely on hold," said RAN's Patrick Reinsborough.
Let's get this straight. If all resisters to the Bush political program were to follow this shameful exhibition by these green groups, we would see peace groups declining to protest against nuclear attacks on Iraq and armed invasion of Afghanistan. We would see civil rights sitting on their hands as racial and religious profiling is used to persecute people of Middle Eastern descent. Defenders of Palestinian rights would say that for the time being they wouldn't protest the use of US Apache helicopters against civilians in West Bank towns and villages.
What nonsense! Principles are never more important than when it is inconvenient or dangerous to stand up for them.
Just send a small donation like $5 to any enviral group. Or get a subscription for Ranger Rick or Animal Baby for a child or grandchild who can't read (censor the wording in some of the articles when you read to them). Then you will be on every mailing list!
The most vicious stuff on the outer envelopes was from Planned Parenthood, NOW, Club Sierra and Greenpeace and some other eviral watermelon groups. These groups have replaced Newt with GW as their antiChrist in their grubbing for money!
This b$tch is a high dollar donor to all left wing extremist organizations, and I saw stuff on her envelopes that I don't get due to my grandkids Animal Baby subscription.
If every Freeper donated a single $5 donation to some fairly clean enviral group, immediately their name would be sold and sent to every hostile watermelon enviral group in the World. I figure my little $12 subscription costs these envirals hundreds of $'s each year in mailings. Most of the time I just throw them away as I pass our garbage shed on the way from the mail box!
If 50,000 Freepers invested a $5 donation to some enviral group or whatever, a minimum of $200/year would be spent on direct mailings from other envirals. This would take $10,000,000 out of the enviral pockets. That would mean $10,000,000 less damage to America's farmers, loggers and just plain Rural Americans would occur each year!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.