To: kd5cts
Big difference between financing and bounties. I finance the squads. (Already have names in mind). Congress pays the bounty for the scrum we bring back. Got it. Congress does not put the captital out to finance it, I do. Risk I take. My guys don't do well, I eat the cost. My guys do well, Congress pays off. I can live with that. Not much different than owning a race-horse. Just cheaper.You have the idea. As a hypothetical, the Cells responsible for the Skyjackings were 5 man cells... figure 4 operatives ($250k) and one cell leader ($1 million), that's $2 million dollars paid to the contractor upon delivery or proved termination... and another major US building safe from that cell.
Congress really ought to consider this, IMHO.
To: Uriel1975
You are seriously on to something here.
It's outside the box, and disarms the hell out of them.
We could post standing bounties for ANYONE who has ever committed a terrorist act against the US.
To: Uriel1975
I don't have the language/cultural skills to pull it off myself,Hire them. Just the best ones. Second best is Most expensive.
/john
To: Uriel1975
what does congress have to do with this? have the cia send it to the chinese to funnel it via clintoon's private numbered offshore accounts and he can take the credit for payoffs (the chinese i understand are good at laundering us dollars). we can all get the accounts set up ourselves. 100 .50s can damage a country's 'infrastructure' 'assets' very deliberate and viciously.
To: Uriel1975
21- bttt - "Congress really ought to consider this, "
176 posted on
09/22/2001 1:15:55 PM PDT by
XBob
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson