Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xm177e2
Perhaps they are going back on their original offer because it would reduce the moral of Russian troops. Can you imagine how it would look if Americans get Bin Laden quickly when the Russians couldn't get his in years?
5 posted on 09/14/2001 6:22:30 PM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: all
Dont the Russians have some kind of secret weapon--- "vapor bomb" that they used in Chechnya. They set these things off at a certain altitude, and the updraft created after the explosion sucks out the air causing lungs to explode. There would be no way to escape it for the Afgans. They could hide under all the rocks and in the caves all they want, there would be no escape. Wasnt this thing called TOSS or TASS or something.
8 posted on 09/14/2001 6:30:16 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Tai_Chung
Can you imagine how it would look if Americans get Bin Laden quickly when the Russians couldn't get his in years?

I also sense a lot of pride in their not wanting NATO troops on their soil, which is understandable. I would prefer the US farm out as much of the work as possible to otber nations, just so we don't go taking on the Islamist world alone. We should still pull more than our share, though. We've got an example to set.

13 posted on 09/14/2001 6:44:01 PM PDT by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson