Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hijackers Planned to Seize PAL (Philippine) Planes for Tuesday U.S. Attack - Manila
Philippine Star News ^ | 14 September 2001 | Philippine Star Newspaper, Manila

Posted on 09/14/2001 7:08:39 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo

Hijackers planned to seize PAL planes for Tuesday US-attack

09/14 5:18:34 PM

Muslim extremists with links to Osama bin Laden, prime suspect in last Tuesday's terrorist attack on the US, had planned to hijack a Manila-based commercial airline which has regular flights to the US mainland.

The planned hijacking of a commercial airliner by a group of terrorists based in the Philippines was disclosed by Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA) General Manager Edgardo Manda, who also said that the Philippine Airlines was the target.

The declassified information revealed that the plan to hijack a PAL plane bound for the US was supposed to be carried out shortly after the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington, DC were attacked by still unknown group or groups of terrorists.

Manda said that the government authorities have raised the level of security at the NAIA's terminal one and two, particularly at the departure areas of foreign airlines that have regular flights to the US.

As disclosed, the intelligence information, according to Manda, was 'A-1' and was relayed to the PAL, Northwest Airlines, and Continental Micronesia. The three airlines have daily flights to the US from Manila.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Moleman
I refuse to put aside my Clinton/Reno axe. Methinks your name is well-chosen. Are you by any chance on the payroll of one of the Clintons? These people have done great harm to us in any number of ways, up to and including accepting campaign financing from Arab groups that support terrorism. Yes, I am standing beside my fellow countrymen, but no, I will not forget about who may have allowed this to happen.
21 posted on 09/14/2001 9:05:43 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic
I believe most government oaths taken in this country state that we are to defend the Constitution and our country against all enemies, domestic or foreign. We have on our hands some domestic enemies that will, sooner or later, have to be brought to justice. We cannot ignore the enemies that happen to be home grown. They are, perhaps, even more of a danger than the foreign-grown. I believe the Clintons to be two such persons.
22 posted on 09/14/2001 9:11:47 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GEC
Expect a visit from the USSS very shortly.

You are a fool.

23 posted on 09/14/2001 9:20:26 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: littleleaguemom
Glad your husband got home on time. I flew to Philippines twice in the late 70s and security at Manila airport was the tightest I'd ever seen anywhere. I was on press trips, as guest of Philippine government tourist ofice, and they rolled out the red carpet for us as we toured the islands. Nevertheless, our luggage was subject to intense scrutiny before we boarded the flight home. All passsengers walked between two rows of armed soldiers to get to the plane. Is security still strong there? (They confiscated a souvernir ceremonial dagger on a plaque given to me by the head of the Philippine Navy in Zamboanga! LOL! But gave it back when we reached the USA)

BTW, the Philippines was one of my favorite tourist destinations. The people were lovely and we all had so much fun.

24 posted on 09/14/2001 10:54:25 AM PDT by PoisedWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Desiring to and saying that I would do it are two different things.

If they want to arrest me, let them come.

I have nothing to hide.

25 posted on 09/14/2001 11:03:24 AM PDT by GEC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: smolensk
With "Project Bojinka" (see the Internet accounts) in the background, this is further evidence of the same question; "Especially after the 9-11 attack, is there some 'mystery' behind why can't the intelligence agencies can't find their own ass with both hands and a flashlight?"
26 posted on 09/14/2001 11:13:03 AM PDT by SKYDRIFTER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Something's not right about this story. It's a long flight from the Philippines to the US.

How was this foiled? If it had truly been in place, it would have been virtually unstoppable, as the plane would be approaching the West Coast in order to be timed with the other coordinated attacks.

If it was foiled on the ground before the flight ever took off, it would have been at least 12 hours before incidents began on the East Coast.

27 posted on 09/14/2001 11:18:17 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GEC
If they want to arrest me, let them come.

Make sure you post a report about your visit. Other freepers have enjoyed them immensely.

28 posted on 09/14/2001 3:21:06 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
And the planes would be coming in without much fuel.
29 posted on 09/14/2001 4:03:18 PM PDT by thesharkboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy
Good point. This doesn't fit the plan at all. If they were planning to hit the west coast, they would have hijacked a plane leaving Los Angeles or San Francisco and turned it around.
30 posted on 09/14/2001 5:03:34 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Philippine Airlines flies nonstop to the US from Manila. The flights leave around 10 am EST, arriving into LAX at dinnertime PST. Manila is a hotbed of Islamic terrorists and was (is?) a base for one of the previous WTC bombers. Makes perfect sense to launch a hijack from there.
31 posted on 09/14/2001 6:09:15 PM PDT by littleleaguemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: littleleaguemom
No, it doesn't. The hijackers wanted a plane loaded with fuel, not one running on fumes coming in from Manila.
32 posted on 09/14/2001 7:45:04 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SKYDRIFTER
Here's an interesting thread. Philippine police according to the French press say Project Bojinka included suicide crashes:

Earlier US airplane hijack plot first uncovered in Philippines: police

33 posted on 09/15/2001 4:19:14 AM PDT by Tarakotchi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: golitely
Hi golitely,

Here are some more OKC "Wild Theories". This Bin Laden OKC connection seems so plausible now. I've read elsewhere Abdul Hakim Murad said they did OKC (and Ramzi Yousef said they did Flight 800).

link to article

The Denver Post Online: Bomb Trial

dpo
back to bomb
back to news
Wild theories spun in book

By Howard Pankratz
Denver Post Legal Affairs Writers

Oct. 12 - In his new book, the lawyer for convicted bomber Timothy McVeigh claims that co-defendant Terry Nichols met with Ramzi Yousef, an Iraqi intelligence operative who masterminded the World Trade Center bombing and was behind a plot to blow up 12 U.S. jets.

In Stephen Jones' "Others Unknown," he claims the meeting occurred sometime in the early 1990s on the island of Mindanao in the Philippines, a "hotbed of fundamentalist Muslim activity." The 331-page book will be in bookstores Nov. 9.

Present were Nichols - who referred to himself as the as "The Farmer" - and Yousef, Abdul Hakim Murad, and Wali Khan Amin Shah, according to Jones.

The subject of the meeting was terrorism. Specifically, three topics were discussed: bombing activities; providing firearms and ammunition; and training in the making and handling of bombs, claimed Jones.

But Nichols' lawyer, Michael Tigar, and Larry Mackey, the former federal prosecutor who spearheaded the government's case against Nichols, say there is no evidence to support Jones' claim.

"It is false, it is defamatory and he (Jones) knows it," said Tigar of the Yousef-Nichols allegation. "From the beginning, one of his (Jones') tactics has been to create a smoke screen by seeking to divert attention from the real serious issues that had to be decided in this case.

"Repeatedly he has hatched the "Conspiracy Theory of the Week,' each one less credible than the last. I don't think behavior of this sort does credit to the justice system. I don't think it does credit to the lawyer who does it and I do not think it is in the interest of his client," said Tigar.

Mackey said that federal investigators "left no stone unturned" and could find nothing indicating a Nichols-Iraqi-Muslim link.

"We ran this down when it first came up long before trial," said Mackey. "And there was absolutely nothing to it." Mackey noted that just a couple of weeks before the McVeigh trial began, Jones made similar, although sketchier, allegations to the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver. But Mackey said the "defining moment" in the McVeigh case came during Jones opening statement when Jones didn't even raise the allegation about a Nichols-Iraqi link.

Mackey said Jones "didn't dare try to sell" such a far-fetched story to a jury of 12 people. Like Tigar, Mackey questions whether Jones should now be trying to sell the theory to the American public.

In his book, Jones admits some members of his staff were skeptical of the information that was developed about Yousef and Nichols. But Jones said it is credible.

Jones said that after their meeting with Nichols, Abdul Hakim Murad, Wali Khan Amin Shah and Ramzi Yousef were charged in the plot to blow up the 12 U.S. jetliners. They were convicted in September 1996, and are serving time in U.S. prisons, said the Enid, Okla., lawyer.

Jones claimed that an extensive investigation by his office in the Philippines, aided by Filipino officials, indicated that one of the convicted plotters, Wali Khan Amin Shah, was acquainted with Nichols' wife, Marife Torres Nichols, a Filipino by birth.

Jones also claimed that Nichols' marriage to Marife was little more than a cover for Nichols as he made his way six times to the Philippines to perfect bomb-making techniques he originally tried to develop on the Nichols farm at Decker, Mich.

Jones called Nichols a liar who fabricated vast portions of his tale about what transpired before the Oklahoma City bombing, which killed 168 people at the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building.

Jones said Nichols set up McVeigh - using methods that Yousef had used over the years, including the attempt to hide the real perpetrators of the World Trade Center bombing.

Jones said that after analyzing Nichols, he was forced to wonder if the Oklahoma City bombing was not a "very clever, well-executed conspiracy.

"Could it have been designed to protect and shelter everyone involved? Everyone, that is except my client - who may or may not have been involved but whose role, if he had a role, would have been the designated patsy?" Jones asked.

"I began to look at everything Nichols had said...and the more I looked, the more it appeared that Nichols, with Tigar as his advocate, was going to try to save his skin at Tim McVeigh's expense."

But Tigar said Jones' portrayal of Nichols is not true.

"I spent three years of my life, along with four other lawyers - and they are good lawyers - and five investigators and five para-legals, tracking every single moment of Terry Nichols' life from the time he was born until the time he walked into the Herington police station,"  said Tigar. "And this ain't true.

"And I'll tell you something else. If there were any credible evidence that Nichols had been involved in a conspiracy to bomb the federal building with Muslim fundamentalists, the United States would have been free to put it on in their case," said Tigar, adding they would have put it on in a "heartbeat" had it been there.

Jones bases his claims about the Nichols-Iraqi intelligence meeting on interviews he said Filipino police had with Edwin Angeles, described as an associate of Yousef, who was arrested in the Philippines and purportedly turned informant against Iraq.

In videotaped and written interviews, Angeles said he met "The Farmer" at the meeting where the "farmer" discussed terrorism with Yousef, Abdul Hakim Murad and Wali Khan Amin Shah.

Jones said Angeles also included a sketch of "the Farmer," which "was a dead ringer for Terry Lynn Nichols." Based on the sketch and the details provided by Angeles, and further investigation of Angeles by lawyer Jim Hankins, Jones concluded that "the Farmer" was Nichols and Nichols and had met Yousef.

But when he asked U.S. District Judge Richard Matsch to subpoena Angeles to testify at the McVeigh trial, Matsch refused, said Jones.

Jones said Angeles was also trying to squirm out of testifying in Denver. Angeles stuck to his original version as videotaped by his Filipino interrogators but started embellishing his story with additional and implausible details.

Jones quoted Vincent Cannistraro, former chief of operations and analysis for the CIA's counterterrorism center, and Laurie Mylroie, of the University of Pennsylvania, as saying they were convinced that the Iraqi intelligence service was deeply committed to attacking the United States within its borders. A key figure in that effort was Yousef, said Jones quoting Mylroie and Cannistraro.

Jones also claimed that Osama bin Laden, the Saudi multimillionaire linked to the bombing of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, was in the Philippines about the same time as Nichols and Yousef.

"Bin Laden - Yousef - Nichols. Now a lot of things made sense," wrote Jones. "The connections kept coming. Bin Laden was known to Ramzi Yousef. Terry Nichols had met Yousef, said Angeles.

"How, given all this, could I not think that Terry had gone in and out of the Philippines at will, using Marife Torres Nichols as a beard, in order to meet with conspirators who had taught him to develop and assemble the ANFO bomb?

"And...if this was true - if, that is, Terry Nichols had gone to the Philippines to be instructed by Ramzi and his band in the art and techniques of blowing up a nine-story building - then mightn't he have learned another part of Ramzi Yousef's modus operandi? That it's always prudent to leave someone else holding the bag?"

Jones noted that this spring, Judge Matsch offered Nichols a deal.

The only way Nichols could avoid life without parole, Matsch said, was for him to name names. If Nichols would identify "others unknown," then Matsch would consider a lighter sentence.

However, Nichols failed to respond and received the life term.

"I believe I know (Matsch) well enough to affirm that he never would have made such a proffer speculatively or frivolously or to gain attention for himself," said Jones. "Could it be that Richard Matsch, persuaded by evidence he refused to let our jury hear, has himself become a conspiracy theorist?"



Return to Top
Return to Bomb Trial
Return to Post Home
cle
34 posted on 09/15/2001 4:25:15 AM PDT by Tarakotchi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: golitely
The plane that flew to St Louis, which was on its way to San Antonio? The one the terrorists had to disembark from and get on a train instead? Think now, what would be easy to reach beyond St. Louis if they had hijacked the aircraft over the St. Louis area... Oklahoma again?
35 posted on 09/15/2001 4:26:02 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GEC
Bake some cookies, fix coffee, and be polite. The Secret Service really doesn't need to be distracted right now, but remember- those poor guys have to spend time protecting Bubba's pompous butt. that's like surrounding an old Yugo economy car with fine sportscars so you won't get the door dinged.
36 posted on 09/15/2001 4:37:32 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Maybe the target wasn't on the U.S. mainland at all. What other U.S. or U.S.-friendly targets might be closer to the Philippines takeoff site? Is there an aircraft carrier nearby, for instance? Just putting some thoughts out there, because honestly, I don't know.
37 posted on 09/15/2001 6:20:41 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Yes, the thought did occur to me, and it would have been an unnecessarily cruel twist--but given the makeup of our enemeies, not out of the question. Were they to have refueled in St. Louis? If so, maybe that was on their sick minds.

I can't help but wonder what the "successful" ones' faces looked like when they sought entrance into Heaven (having believed their leaders' promises)....

38 posted on 09/15/2001 6:25:12 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
The link Tarakotchi provided in #33 is well worth the time to peruse. Lots of good research on the thread, and given the high quality of the various flags, I suspect still more will appear.
39 posted on 09/15/2001 6:28:18 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarakotchi
Keep moving; you're on the correct track.
40 posted on 09/15/2001 8:47:22 AM PDT by SKYDRIFTER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson