Yes, obviously, but what I find interesting is the passive voice. What 'prefers' the firing of one set of neurons over another - another set of neurons? How do mere physiological processes account for the notion of morality itself, with its attendant concepts of freedom, agency, obligation, accountability, and dignity? How is it that mere electrochemical reactions in the brain lead logically to any coherent, intelligible concept of 'right' or 'wrong'?
Cordially,
I don't think there is anything "mere" about the workings of our brains.