Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THIS IS WAR ( Ann Coulter tells it like it is ) ***A Must Read***
dailynews.yahoo ^ | 9/12/2001 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 09/13/2001 6:52:52 AM PDT by TLBSHOW

THIS IS WAR

By Ann Coulter

Barbara Olson kept her cool. In the hysteria and terror of hijackers herding passengers to the rear of the plane, she retrieved her cell phone and called her husband, Ted, the solicitor general of the United States. She informed him that he had better call the FBI (news - web sites) -- the plane had been hijacked. According to reports, Barbara was still on the phone with Ted when her plane plunged in a fiery explosion directly into the Pentagon (news - web sites).

Barbara risked having her neck slit to warn the country of a terrorist attack. She was a patriot to the very end.

This is not to engage in the media's typical hallucinatory overstatement about anyone who is the victim of a horrible tragedy. The furtive cell phone call was an act of incredible daring and panache. If it were not, we'd be hearing reports of a hundred more cell phone calls. (Even people who swear to hate cell phones carry them for commercial air travel.)

The last time I saw Barbara in person was about three weeks ago. She generously praised one of my recent columns and told me I had really found my niche. Ted, she said, had taken to reading my columns aloud to her over breakfast.

I mention that to say three things about Barbara. First, she was really nice. A lot of people on TV seem nice, but aren't. (And some who don't seem nice, are.) But Barbara was always her charming, graceful, ebullient self. "Nice" is an amazingly rare quality among writers. In the opinion business, bitter, jealous hatred is the norm. Barbara had reason to be secure.

Second, it was actually easy to imagine Ted reading political columns aloud to Barbara at the breakfast table. Theirs was a relationship that could only be cheaply imitated by Bill and Hillary -- the latter being a subject of Barbara's appropriately biting best seller, "Hell to Pay."

Hillary claimed preposterously in the Talk magazine interview that she discussed policy with Bill while cutting his grapefruit in the morning. Ted and Barbara really did talk politics -- and really did have breakfast together.

It's "Ted and Barbara" just like it's Fred and Ginger, and George and Gracie. They were so perfect together, so obvious, that their friends were as happy they were on their wedding day. This is more than the death of a great person and patriotic American. It's a human amputation.

Third, since Barbara's compliment, I've been writing my columns for Ted and Barbara. I'm always writing to someone in my head. Now I don't know who to write to. Ted and Barbara were a good muse.

Apart from hearing that this beautiful light has been extinguished from the world, only one other news flash broke beyond the numbingly omnipresent horror of the entire day. That evening, CNN reported that bombs were dropping in Afghanistan (news - web sites) -- and then updated the report to say they weren't our bombs.

They should have been ours. I want them to be ours.

This is no time to be precious about locating the exact individuals directly involved in this particular terrorist attack. Those responsible include anyone anywhere in the world who smiled in response to the annihilation of patriots like Barbara Olson.

We don't need long investigations of the forensic evidence to determine with scientific accuracy the person or persons who ordered this specific attack. We don't need an "international coalition." We don't need a study on "terrorism." We certainly didn't need a congressional resolution condemning the attack this week.

The nation has been invaded by a fanatical, murderous cult. And we welcome them. We are so good and so pure we would never engage in discriminatory racial or "religious" profiling.

People who want our country destroyed live here, work for our airlines, and are submitted to the exact same airport shakedown as a lumberman from Idaho. This would be like having the Wehrmacht immigrate to America and work for our airlines during World War II. Except the Wehrmacht was not so bloodthirsty.

"All of our lives" don't need to change, as they keep prattling on TV. Every single time there is a terrorist attack -- or a plane crashes because of pilot error -- Americans allow their rights to be contracted for no purpose whatsoever.

The airport kabuki theater of magnetometers, asinine questions about whether passengers "packed their own bags," and the hostile, lumpen mesomorphs ripping open our luggage somehow allowed over a dozen armed hijackers to board four American planes almost simultaneously on Bloody Tuesday. (Did those fabulous security procedures stop a single hijacker anyplace in America that day?)

Airports scrupulously apply the same laughably ineffective airport harassment to Suzy Chapstick as to Muslim hijackers. It is preposterous to assume every passenger is a potential crazed homicidal maniac. We know who the homicidal maniacs are. They are the ones cheering and dancing right now.

We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anncoulter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 next last
To: BubbaZanetti
"I'll be at the F.A.I.R.(Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting) website to catalogue Ann's various fallacies and outright hogwash. Should take a few hours."

You must have drank too much Ovaltine, Captain Midnite. Your code ring just divulged you as "Flaming Liberal"

121 posted on 09/13/2001 9:50:24 PM PDT by secondamendmentkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Interesting thing about that photo is how disinterested she looks. I've seen a lot of people in shock or disbelief. She's not in either. She's there for a photo op.
122 posted on 09/13/2001 9:51:30 PM PDT by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
"We don't need long investigations of the forensic evidence to determine with scientific accuracy the person or persons who ordered this specific attack. "
What a frightening statement. This logic would have allowed McVeigh to escape while targeting people who have a different religion from Ms Coulter.

I believe you are misreading her sentence (which is admittedly slightly ambiguous).

She's not saying "we don't need to determine with scientific accuracy who did this, so screw the evidence", instead she is saying, "we can quickly determine with scientific accuracy who did this, because doing so doesn't require long investigations of forensic evidence."

In other words, we can be very sure very quickly after tracing the evidence, it won't take months and months of minute analysis.

123 posted on 09/13/2001 10:10:25 PM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

Comment #124 Removed by Moderator

To: Dan Day
"In other words, we can be very sure very quickly after tracing the evidence, it won't take months and months of minute analysis."

This is probably true.

125 posted on 09/13/2001 10:27:57 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
Ann's point is hyperbolic but she's thinking more about wiping out the particular totalitarian strain of Islam better known as Islamist Nazism. We should make it as extinct as the British made the Thuggee cult in 19th century India. Religion shouldn't be used as cover to practice human sacrifices, commit mass murder, and launch a campaign of total war against the West. Islamist Nazism as we saw Tuesday is all too real and we should certainly seek out and destroy all the adherents and disciples of this nefarious criminal sect. Innocent people every where will thank us for it.
126 posted on 09/13/2001 10:28:34 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Ann is the bomb. A stone fox babe as well as an intellectual giant and a no bullshit conservative. Ann for President.
127 posted on 09/13/2001 10:34:21 PM PDT by rebelsoldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
Ann worded this one just right.

Front page of buzzRats says about it.

This Ann Coulter column is appalling, almost deranged by the time you get to the end of it. Has she no decency, has she no sense of propiety?

Ann you did real good!

128 posted on 09/14/2001 7:19:03 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Have you guys been to DemocraticUnderground? They insult Republicans for being sexist, but they are feel no guilt making sexually insulting remarks about Ann. They are all a bunch of atheistic cowards who are only united due to their want to be molested by Bill Clinton.
129 posted on 09/14/2001 9:22:35 AM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains
Did you mean this thread? Idiot rats they are

"HEY! ANN COULTER!!....HEY!! FREEPERS!!!"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/cgi-bin/duforum/duboard.cgi?az=list_threads&om=4588&forum=DCForumID35

130 posted on 09/14/2001 10:01:04 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: BubbaZanetti
*No one would accuse Ann of getting her facts right.* Just list the facts! Nothing but the facts! I don't believe in censorship even when one dissents at a time like this. I do believe that site pests who just spout nonsense to upset a forum should be gone since they don't contribute anything for either side. This is a time of crisis for all of us, a time that emotions run high, but most of all a time for us to really communicate and, in the end, present ourselves as united for the world to witness. Patriots can disagree but to be a real patriot, our nation must come before personal hatreds. In my opinion, Ann got it right. Please explain her errors. God Bless Us All!
131 posted on 09/14/2001 10:12:54 AM PDT by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Powerful! God bless Barbara Olson.
132 posted on 09/14/2001 10:46:05 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Another wonderful article from Ann. I've enjoyed Ann's articles for quite a while, but this one lets us in, probably for the first time, to see Ann's heart. Thanks for the peek, Ann!
133 posted on 09/15/2001 6:36:26 AM PDT by plsvn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I love Barbara Olson and I love Ann. In this column Ann expresses concisely how we all feeling about the lost of Barbara. This is a great evil that has come upon our land?but it is also possible to bring greater evil into the world if caution and patience is not exercised in redressing this diabolical threat. There is no doubt that we are at war, but we don?t have to wage the war that bin Laden wants. He wants a crusade against him?and he may get it?but I would argue for some initial responses which would actually be more harmful to him and his cause. I?m a graduate student of Middle East history who spent last year on a fellowship to Israel. I?m not claiming this makes me an expert on what has gone on, but I do think I can offer some legitimate arguments for exercising some patience. Follow this link to the rest of my essay: http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3ba77fe861ee.htm
134 posted on 09/18/2001 4:47:45 PM PDT by Heuristic Hiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I'm quite sure i'm in the minority here, but I would like to say that I find Ann Coulter's article obscene. She combines self-promotion with a eulogy for a friend, tacks on a random attack on Clinton, and then ends with an idiotic, inflammatory suggestion - that we convert them all to Christianity.
135 posted on 09/19/2001 9:47:16 AM PDT by Egregious Philbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

Comment #136 Removed by Moderator

To: Egregious Philbin
You're right, you are in the minority here. We love attacks on Clinton. He attacked America for 8 years. And assuming its voluntary, what's wrong with converting people to Christianity? No one is trying to destroy Western civilization in the name of that religion.
137 posted on 09/19/2001 5:10:12 PM PDT by Capt. Jake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Egregious Philbin
IIRC, isn't Coulter Jewish? Sounds a mite tongue in cheek.
138 posted on 09/19/2001 5:12:20 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Jake
If you want to bring back a Crusades-era pope, I guess it "could be done." No branch of Christianity works that way today. (Though if they end up with governments that tolerate evangelism, that would be a good thing.)
139 posted on 09/19/2001 5:14:37 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: themadirishman
by his logic, we should ban fundamentalist christians from the area around abortion clinics because some of them seem to like blowing them up and killing the doctors inside

Tongue in cheek dude? :-)

140 posted on 09/19/2001 5:15:49 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson