Replies

Times change, principles do not. I beg to differ about our "friends" and I am sure you mean the Brits and French. I would be more apt to say they used us. The Brits have the singular ability of propaganda and intrigue and they used it well in WWI and WWII. WWI was a European War and would have ended like the endless European Wars of the past without our "assistance". With our "assistance" we allowed a vindictive England and France to dictate horrendous terms upon the Germans for a war these 'friends' were also responsible for. The Versaille Peace agreed to by the internationalist Wilson and our 'friends'lead to the rise of Hitler. So dear FDR, another internationalist, wants us in the next European War but the Germans won't accomodate despite his numerous provocations. Beloved FDR manuevers the Japanese into attacking us and we get into the war by the backdoor. The only real victors in WWII were the Soviets and do not tell me freedom won out in Europe when we allowed the Soviets to occupy East and Central Europe. Then began a series of our 'police actions', CIA involvements around the world, vast amounts of American tax money spent around the world and American lives lost on crusades for democracy. Have we achieved anything by this? Yes! We are hated more around the world and we have more enemies. If we follow the policies planned for this war by this government we will need to overthrow various governments and install new ones. These new ones will be known by the populace for what they are: puppet governments. They will need to be supported by American soldiers and American money. They will be prime targets for attack. Our American servicemen have, for almost 100 years, been the pawns of internationalists and though any American blood spilled is never in vain (we must honor them for their sacrifices)we must realize that the policies and lies of the internationalists and NWO types have not succeeded. They have only brought on new wars and new enemies. Punish the terrorists but correct the policies that brought this about.

bold off. Bump. That is one of the best summaries of the last 100 years of US foreign policy I've seen.

Best reply in a week! Thank you so much. More people would know this, but they studied history in government schools. Clearly, we're paying for Clinton's legacy. One wonders why some just can't admit that, unless, of course, they voted for him in 1992 (or, worse, Perot).

The gray cells seem to be returning.