Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our enemies meant what they said
Boston Globe ^ | 9/13/01 | Jeff Jacoby

Posted on 09/13/2001 4:26:28 AM PDT by vrwc54

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:06:48 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

NOW THAT IT has happened to us, the White House is not calling for ''restraint.'' The State Department is not concerned about ''escalating the cycle of violence.'' There are no editorials imploring the parties to conduct a ''peace process'' and ''sit down at the negotiating table.''


(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 09/13/2001 4:26:28 AM PDT by vrwc54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vrwc54
Now that it has happened to us, our eyes have finally opened.

What a deadly price to pay
to come out of the grey.

2 posted on 09/13/2001 4:28:56 AM PDT by Joan_of_Argghh!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vrwc54
bttttttttt
3 posted on 09/13/2001 4:36:48 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vrwc54
For years we have acted as if the front line were elsewhere, and as if our job was to watch from the sidelines and make sure our friends didn't defend themselves too aggressively.

The greatest folly of Americans is to believe that which the elitist, one world socialist, news-reader tells them...

4 posted on 09/13/2001 4:42:00 AM PDT by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: dennisw
Actual headlines:
“Israel Kills Palestinian Activist”
-Washington Post headline, August 28, 2001

”Palestinian anger increases each time Israeli troops attempt to kill one of their activists.”
-NPR’s “Morning Edition,” August 24, 2001


6 posted on 09/13/2001 4:46:44 AM PDT by vrwc54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vrwc54
Dropping bombs on isolated terrorists and their sponsors will not solve the mideast problem which deserves a more comprehensive solution.

We must take Iraq while the world is sympathetic to our plight. Pump enough oil to significantly reduce oil prices, stimulating the world economy. The lower oil prices will cause the mideast regimes to collapse so we must set up democracies there. Buy western Jordan for a new Palestinian state with infrastructure paid for by the Iraqi oil fields. Create US bases in Iraq from which to enforce regional stability. Afghanistan/Syria/Iran/Sudan are much easier to deal with once the US bases are in place with a million troops to back up our policies. And it gets rid of the requirement for US carriers over there.

DO IT NOW. WE MUST USE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO STABILIZE THE MIDEAST AND NEUTRALIZE TERRORISM.


BUMP

7 posted on 09/13/2001 4:48:48 AM PDT by tm22721
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DistantVoice
Nor have some of the denizens of FR.

Pretty bad timing for Kudzu with her choice of an Arabic screenname.

8 posted on 09/13/2001 4:50:25 AM PDT by vrwc54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vrwc54
More American blood will be shed to achieve victory in this war, but that has always been the cost,

and I beleive the resolve of our country says "So be it, lets get on with it".

Its a sad time, but the renewed sense of Patriotism in this land feels good.

9 posted on 09/13/2001 4:53:35 AM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vrwc54
And when the shooting starts, can reporters please do us a favor and clean the feces out of their ears like they forgot to do during Desert Storm press conferences. For those who may have forgot, or were too young to remember, these were some of the most inane and repeat questions ever asked in journalism's history. General Schwarzkopf did one of the first briefings and opened with exact specifics about what he could and couldn't talk about in the briefing (like current battle plans). The first reporter asked a question that the General said in his opening statement that he couldn't cover. If the reporter was listening then he could have saved himself from looking stupid. Some good questions were asked and answered. Then a reporter asked the same question that was answered completely five questions before. I still think to this day that the reporters asking the exact same questions were only given one question by their news department and wanted face time so bad they read it rather than not be on national TV. They weren't grilling the General because all of the repeat questions could not be answered better. At no time do I remember the press asking him to expand on a point. Then there were several more questions about things we at home knew he couldn't talk about (for our soldier's safety) but that didn't stop these morons. I could tell he getting annoyed as I was.
10 posted on 09/13/2001 4:55:43 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vrwc54
Are they also calling these killers of 20,000 Americans "activists".
11 posted on 09/13/2001 4:59:20 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vrwc54
Washington is not being warned to avoid a ''provocative'' response, or cautioned against retaliation that is ''excessive and disproportionate.''

Oh yeah? Check this, Jacoby: MPs warn Blair on scale of retaliation

12 posted on 09/13/2001 5:04:25 AM PDT by CommiesOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tm22721
I'm thinking we take the United Arab Emirates first.

Our 51st state.
13 posted on 09/13/2001 5:06:42 AM PDT by Maelstrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
And when the shooting starts, can reporters please do us a favor and clean the feces out of their ears like they forgot to do during Desert Storm press conferences

Sorry for butting in but I agree totally with your statement. They need to stay "off the beaches" too! Remember Samalia? I just hear a reporter on ABC this morning ask a team in New York using a dog if they had found any "living survivors" during the night. Jeezzz.

14 posted on 09/13/2001 5:11:54 AM PDT by Mopp4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DistantVoice
Someone just trotted out McNamara...

The man who f$$$ed up in Viet Nam is certainly a credible voice for what should be done now - not!

15 posted on 09/13/2001 5:26:19 AM PDT by WarEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vrwc54
"Kudzu with her choice of an Arabic screenname."

Kudzu is a plant that is growning across the South. It originally came from Japan in the 1920's. It has nothing to do with Islam.

16 posted on 09/13/2001 5:40:02 AM PDT by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
I was for Libya first. It's right in the Mediterrean. Decaptitat the Ghaddafi regime and take their oil to pay for the war. Perhaps the Italians would like their colony back.
17 posted on 09/13/2001 6:32:01 AM PDT by Kermit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DistantVoice, dennisw, Yehuda, Thinkin' Gal, TrueBeliever9, Prodigal Daughter, grunt03
The ecumenical spirit of the antichrist will contribute to the downfall of the nation.  Evil men and seducers have waxed worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived until the masses think they can compromise with a culture and religion of death which has sworn to kill all Christians and Jews.  To compromise in this instance is to consent to one's own death.  There is Ec 3:8 A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace.  Woe to the people who don't know the difference.

Jer 51:30 The mighty men of Babylon have forborn to fight, they have remained in their holds: their might hath failed; they became as women: they have burned her dwellingplaces; her bars are broken.

18 posted on 09/13/2001 6:35:41 AM PDT by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep

 

http://www.americanfriends.org/nuclear/peaceIslam_N313.html

Islam says the world is divided into two parts.
1.The first is Dar el-Islam or the World of Islam
2. All the rest is Dar el-Harb or the world of the sword or the world of war -- that is those non-Muslim nations that have yet to be conquered.

Is peace possible between Israel and the Arab world?
The answer is YES -- But only after mind-boggling changes in the Arab world. True peace can only be made after the Arab world undergoes democratization. Simply put, democracies rarely go to war with one another. All our major wars of the last two hundred years have been between dictators or between democracies defending themselves from dictators. When a ruler is elected by the people, he has a natural restraint preventing him from sending their sons and daughters into combat in an aggressive war. No such restraint exists anywhere in the Arab world.

ISLAM AND JIHAD
The second major change required of the Arab/Moslem world is to create secular states not subservient to the rule of Islam. The problem for Israel with the rise of Islamic fundamentalism is the very hostile attitude that Islam has toward Jews and any non-Islamic person. Islam is all encompassing and guides behavior, law, religion and attitudes and relations with non-Moslems.Islam perceives the world as two separate parts:

1.The first is Dar el-Islam or the World of Islam
2. All the rest is Dar el-Harb or the world of the sword or the world of war -- that is those non-Muslim nations that have yet to be conquered.

The concept of JIHAD or Holy War has been understood by most of us but there is another concept in the Koran with which few of us are familiar. But it is essential to understand this concept when relating to Moslems. That is the law of HUDAIBIYA which dates back to Muhammad and states clearly that "Muslims are permitted to lie and break agreements with non- Muslims." This applies to business, personal life and politics. Would a peace treaty be worth much if the other party is Moslem?

(T)he law of HUDAIBIYA which dates back to Muhammad... states clearly that "Muslims are permitted to lie and break agreements with non-Muslims."

 


19 posted on 09/13/2001 6:38:26 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep

 

http://www.americanfriends.org/nuclear/peaceIslam_N313.html

Islam says the world is divided into two parts.
1.The first is Dar el-Islam or the World of Islam
2. All the rest is Dar el-Harb or the world of the sword or the world of war -- that is those non-Muslim nations that have yet to be conquered.

Is peace possible between Israel and the Arab world?
The answer is YES -- But only after mind-boggling changes in the Arab world. True peace can only be made after the Arab world undergoes democratization. Simply put, democracies rarely go to war with one another. All our major wars of the last two hundred years have been between dictators or between democracies defending themselves from dictators. When a ruler is elected by the people, he has a natural restraint preventing him from sending their sons and daughters into combat in an aggressive war. No such restraint exists anywhere in the Arab world.

ISLAM AND JIHAD
The second major change required of the Arab/Moslem world is to create secular states not subservient to the rule of Islam. The problem for Israel with the rise of Islamic fundamentalism is the very hostile attitude that Islam has toward Jews and any non-Islamic person. Islam is all encompassing and guides behavior, law, religion and attitudes and relations with non-Moslems.Islam perceives the world as two separate parts:

1.The first is Dar el-Islam or the World of Islam
2. All the rest is Dar el-Harb or the world of the sword or the world of war -- that is those non-Muslim nations that have yet to be conquered.

The concept of JIHAD or Holy War has been understood by most of us but there is another concept in the Koran with which few of us are familiar. But it is essential to understand this concept when relating to Moslems. That is the law of HUDAIBIYA which dates back to Muhammad and states clearly that "Muslims are permitted to lie and break agreements with non- Muslims." This applies to business, personal life and politics. Would a peace treaty be worth much if the other party is Moslem?

(T)he law of HUDAIBIYA which dates back to Muhammad... states clearly that "Muslims are permitted to lie and break agreements with non-Muslims."

 


20 posted on 09/13/2001 6:38:59 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson