Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Republican Makes Case for Terrorist Assassination
CNSNews ^ | 9/13/01 | Jim Burns

Posted on 09/13/2001 3:42:47 AM PDT by kattracks

(CNSNews.com) - A top House Republican is pushing for legislation that would permit the United States to use assassination as a tool to get back at terrorists and others who pose national security threats.

Rep. Bob Barr (R-Ga.), a member of the House Judiciary Committee, believes the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C. Tuesday provide an opportunity for Congress to pass the Terrorist Elimination Act, which he introduced earlier this year.

Barr called on his congressional colleagues to take "real steps towards untying the hands" of the U.S. military and intelligence community in order to fight what he called the "war against terrorism."

"The grief and mourning all of us are feeling today must be balanced by our resolve to identify and take action against those responsible for these despicable and cowardly acts," said Barr. "I call on Congress and the president to immediately pass and sign into law the Terrorist Elimination Act."

Barr's legislation would nullify several provisions of executive orders that were passed during the Ford, Carter and Reagan administrations, which banned U.S.-sanctioned assassinations of terrorist leaders.

Barr believes such a policy "prevent(s) necessary surgical strikes against known terrorist leaders."

"We must give our government every tool at hand to combat those persons who threaten and destroy American lives, and commit terrorist acts across the world," Barr said.

The bill was introduced last January and still awaits action in the House International Relations Committee.

Meanwhile, Secretary of State Colin Powell on Wednesday didn't indicate what action the administration would take against the terrorists.

"The American people have a clear understanding that this is a war. That's the way they see it. You can't see it any other way, whether legally that is correct or not," said Powell Wednesday. "We've got to respond as if it is a war. We've got to respond with the sense that it isn't going to be resolved with a single counterattack against one individual."

Powell also said the United States was not about to immediately launch any military operation and did not yet know who was behind the attacks.

"We are far from selecting any particular military targets or how to go after those targets at this time. We have go to build a case,'' Powell said.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/13/2001 3:42:47 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Posturing - Bin Laden is not a head of state and the President and Congress can move ahead as they see fit even without this.
2 posted on 09/13/2001 3:45:26 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Cowards assassinate.

Men make war.

3 posted on 09/13/2001 3:49:31 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
An assassination is a war on a very tiny scale.
4 posted on 09/13/2001 3:51:05 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Cowards assassinate.
Men make war.

Two quick points....You can't make war against an individual (Bin Laden)...and when fighting these types of cowards, the "Fight fire with Fire' axiom is a fairly servicable one...

5 posted on 09/13/2001 3:51:49 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
An enemy is an enemy, whether 1 or a million. When real enemies are removed on a small scale, it prevents later action on a large scale.

If, for example, Bin Laden had been targeted and removed ASAP after his very 1st terrorist act, many other atrocities would have been prevented. The dismanteling of national security policies and procedures by the Clinton adminstration, and the tolerance of known terrorists has now resulted in these acts of war upon our own people and mainland.

7 posted on 09/13/2001 4:06:52 AM PDT by good1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Thanks for posting this. It provides a real chance for those who stood upon the Capitol steps and sang, "God Bless America" to back up their talk.

Were Daschle and Gephardt really singing? I didn't see their mouths moving very much.

8 posted on 09/13/2001 4:09:45 AM PDT by good1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: good1
>>Were Daschle and Gephardt really singing? I didn't see their mouths moving very much<<

They don't know the words.

9 posted on 09/13/2001 4:12:03 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Barr was the only one about two months calling for an end to our ban on foreign assination. Even O'Reilly disagreed with him on this. Barr was called a nut, a kook, a right wing nut. Now who was right????? I say Bob Barr deserves our support.
10 posted on 09/13/2001 4:50:08 AM PDT by chris1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
The US absolutely should have assassination in it's arsenal to protect American interests. To have a law saying we can't kill foreign leaders when they wage war on us is the ultimate capitulation, preemtively at that.

We are seen as contemptibly weak! This cannot be.

We have to be tough, and be perceived as tough. If we had entered Afghanistan days after the World Trade Center bombing in 1993 and assassinated Bin Laden, not only would the WTC be standing today and 10,000 plus lives been spared, but every other terrorist organization would think twice before rousing the sleeping giant.

11 posted on 09/13/2001 5:01:54 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Surgical assassination of terrorists will not solve the mideast problem which deserves a more comprehensive solution.

We must take Iraq while the world is sympathetic to our plight. Pump enough oil to significantly reduce oil prices, stimulating the world economy. The lower oil prices will cause the mideast regimes to collapse so we must set up democracies there. Buy western Jordan for a new Palestinian state with infrastructure paid for by the Iraqi oil fields. Create US bases in Iraq from which to enforce regional stability. Afghanistan/Syria/Iran/Sudan are much easier to deal with once the US bases are in place with a million troops to back up our policies. And it gets rid of the requirement for US carriers over there and for massive military support of Israel.

DO IT NOW. WE MUST USE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO STABILIZE THE MIDEAST AND NEUTRALIZE TERRORISM.


BUMP

12 posted on 09/13/2001 5:04:52 AM PDT by tm22721
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Care to bet that bill moves out of committe very quickly?
13 posted on 09/13/2001 5:28:25 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
God bless Bob Barr. God bless the United States of America.
14 posted on 09/13/2001 5:38:54 AM PDT by LoneGOPinCT (I'm envious of those of you with actual representation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
A preemptive strike against a terrorists or hosts can never be considered assassination but a wise military choice whether one at a time or collectivly for purpose of saving innocent civilians it is prefered to strike one at a time...SHOOT FOR THE HEAD take no prisoners
15 posted on 09/13/2001 5:42:56 AM PDT by Tigen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Terrorist Elimination Act - For once an act that does not have an Orwellian title.
16 posted on 09/13/2001 5:55:31 AM PDT by truth_eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris1
Barr was the only one about two months calling for an end to our ban on foreign assination. Even O'Reilly disagreed with him on this. Barr was called a nut, a kook, a right wing nut. Now who was right????? I say Bob Barr deserves our support.

10 Posted on 09/13/2001 04:50:08 PDT by chris1

O'Reilly is a squishy socialist.

His tag line is "Who is looking out for us?"

He is looking for Big Brother.

XeniaSt

17 posted on 09/13/2001 10:31:55 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (truth@YeshuaHaMashiach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson