[Dog Gone]

I would be very worried, except that this comes from World Net Daily, which is sometimes very good, and sometimes worse than the stupidest tabloid.

[Timesink]

I would be very worried, except that this comes from World Net Daily, which is sometimes very good, and sometimes worse than the stupidest tabloid.

Also note the article is from APRIL. Why "merely" take out the World Trade Center, wasting 15-20 perfectly good, expensively-trained terrorists in the process, when he could simply have one terrorist go to Times Square and let a suitcase nuke off? If he's going to risk a reprisal so strong it will likely destroy his entire operation anyway, why only go out with a comparative whimper?