To: Messianic_Zionist
This is not the worst-case scenario. A worst-case scenario is a 25-megaton nuclear bomb detonated in New York or a full-scale attack against the U.S.!" No, worst case scenario would be biological agents of a highly contagious nature released into a couple of major cities. A nuke in NY, while devestating is contollable, this would not be.
8 posted on
09/12/2001 8:33:00 AM PDT by
riri
To: riri
Castro has also been reported to be involved in biological experimentation.
10 posted on
09/12/2001 8:35:34 AM PDT by
mgist
To: riri
No, the worst case scenerio (from the point of view of those who pass out the news) is that Clinton shares any blame on this.
To: riri
But the purpose of terrorists is NOT to decimate a population completely - the 'fun' would be over in that case. The purpose of terrorists is to instill fear in the civilian population. Terrorists always hit and run - they don't take out huge entities or peoples. There is one positive in all this: people (at least in my area) went out and bought guns and ammunition big-time.
32 posted on
09/12/2001 10:37:59 AM PDT by
almajur
(ALMARAY@webtv.net)
To: riri and all
What many were told by a speaker at a conference last weekend was that 130 Iraqi women were known to be set to smuggle into this country vials of anthrax in their vaginas to disseminate within 100 U.S. cities. I understand colloidal silver can counter it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson