Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA Officials Reveal What Went Wrong – Clinton to Blame
NewsMax | Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2001 | Christopher Ruddy

Posted on 09/12/2001 5:13:03 AM PDT by truther

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-135 next last
To: rightintexas
"Under Reagan and Bush, Bin Laden and Afgan rebels were CIA funded and trained. We spend BILLIONS on defense, so stop saying Clinton "gutted" all these agencies is just nonsense."

The first statement you made is true; however, there is simply NO WAY their future anti-U.S., terroristic potential could have been known at the time when Reagan was arming the Afghan rebels against the Russians. The earlier decision eventually led to bad results, but it is NOT entirely true that it was a bad decision at the time it was made.

Your second statement is PURE NONSENSE! We will always "spend billions on defense" just like we spend billions on lots of other things, but how many billions and just how the billions are spent are the real issues. Clinton both defunded and politicized intelligence, security, and the military with a vengeance for the full eight years of his disastrous tenure. I wonder if he and Hillary the Great have any appreciation of the results of what they and their evil, lying toadies have done to this country. I doubt it.

61 posted on 09/12/2001 8:27:38 AM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Thank you so much, A-G! That information is very helpful. Reason being: The traitors are going to - have already begun - blaming Bush for this attack just as they were already blaming him for the economy. Both the economic problems and the military/intelligence weaknesses of our country were INHERITED BY PRESIDENT BUSH from the people who want to destroy America - as long as they are on top in power!

Our enemies are within - and all America must know it!

Mr. Woolsley was on this morning encouraging the Bush administration to go further than just thinking the terrorists and those who "harbor" them must be dealt with. He said he hoped the Bush team would also focus on the NATIONS who finance, who train, who sponsor terrorism as part of their official policy - something the Clinton administration STOPPED DOING SHORTLY AFTER HE CAME INTO OFFICE!!!!

I totally agree with him!

62 posted on 09/12/2001 8:38:48 AM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
I'm glad the information was helpful!!! Indeed, we must communicate what went wrong so it can be fixed for good!
63 posted on 09/12/2001 8:59:07 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: themightysrc
Intelligence is definitely a substantial part of the prevention effort, no qestion. However, inadequate procedures currently in place in our airports are also at fault. The coordinated and succesful hijacking of four planes from three airports should not even be within the realm of possibility. Intelligence or no!

Does anyone recall the rash of hijackings in the 70's and how they were stopped? Hmmm???

On several occasions during the two term blight on our nation that was the administration of X42, the FAA conducted several studies of airline security. On at least one occasion the findings were addressed directly to the president together with recommended improvements. X42 did not see fit to implement any security enhancements.

Clinton culpible??? I rest my case.

The platform for international terrorist activity over the last thirty plus years has primarily been commercial airline travel. Short of placing armed, federal marshals on board each flight, cockpits should be intruder proof to prevent terrorists from taking over control of aircraft. Video cameras should be installed at every gate to make a visual record of the persons who actually board each flight. I realize the latter is after the fact regarding yesterday's tragedy but I expect the FBI and CIA would give anything to have just such evidence today. If the local convenience store can afford this technology I expect the airports in this country can as well.

IMHO

64 posted on 09/12/2001 9:00:44 AM PDT by t4texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: christine11, abigail2
ditto
65 posted on 09/12/2001 9:13:44 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SmartEnough,the_doc,lukefreeman,oldglory,seekingthetruth,minutegal,gonzo, all
#11: "I'm not going to focus on Clinton. I want to go after the bastards that took advantage and killed Americans!"

You don't solve a problem by dealing with symtoms of the problem. You solve it by dealing with the THE problem.

The PROBLEM is the feminization of America and its great institutions by the party of the emasculated; The DemocRAT Party.

Clinton, "The Great Emasculator" is the epitome / poster boy for that party.

Algore, Clinton's emasculated hand-picked successor, did all in his power to try and prevent the military vote from being counted in Florida.

Algore, the choice of the emasculated party to be THEIR president.

Algore, the feminized male who hired and paid Naiomi Wolfe to teach him how to be an "alpha male".

Cowardly "BASTARDS", as you call them, cannot "take advantage" of MEN.

Thats the "problem" that must be solved.

66 posted on 09/12/2001 9:38:57 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (Feminized males and shallow females in the USA have INVITED this attack on America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: truther
Bttt
67 posted on 09/12/2001 9:43:56 AM PDT by DreamWeaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truther
Let's not forget how Clinton used our cruise missile arsenal as a tool for political distraction, bombing aspirin factories and lobbing missiles at Saddam Hussein whenever it became politically useful. Military reports indicated that we couldn't even carry on basic operations with Clinton's misuse of military arms.
68 posted on 09/12/2001 9:50:59 AM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truther
Did you happen to catch CNN’s Judy Woodruff interview withTom Clancy on the evening of 9/11?

Tom brought up the subject of the CLINTON decimation of US HUMAN INTELLIGENCE capabilities – that going all the way back to Sun Tsu, SPIES are a necessary part of the information gathering process. He mentioned that if we’d had a few spies and spooks out there in this increasingly dangerous world, we MIGHT have gotten one of them close to the perpetrator and been able to interdict the MURDER of perhaps 15,000 Americans in the incredible tragedy we witnessed this morning.

I think it’s safe to say that Clancy knows a bit about the subjects on which he writes.

Tom then tagged CNN by name as one of the news agencies that greeted Clinton’s decimation of the intelligence community with approval, continuing to say that they COULD have spoken out TO OPPOSE HIM but failed to do so. Tom’s rather clear implication was that CNN played a role in today’s catastrophe.

Judy VISIBLY RECOILED – and quickly concluded the interview. Her expression made it clear that she was NOT happy with Tom.

Clancy was RIGHT ON THE MARK and until we DO beef up those assets, it’s gonna happen again – and probably sooner than later.

And do you suppose there is some sinister significance to the fact that this happened on 9-11 (911!)? Are these people THAT sick? Don’t bother responding as that was a rhetorical question.

Let’s all pray – and shed a tear or two -- for the lost firefighters, police officers, innocent citizens and their families. Until this is behind us, we must put aside as many of our partisan differences as our principles will allow.

And we must also pray that our precious Constitution does not become one of the first victims of this SICKENING and senseless act.

THE HORROR! THE H O R R O R!!!!!!!!!!

69 posted on 09/12/2001 9:57:53 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Totally agree with you!
70 posted on 09/12/2001 9:58:07 AM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: truther
Bump
71 posted on 09/12/2001 10:03:05 AM PDT by DreamWeaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: themightysrc
Clinton not largely responsible???? In '96 I predicted that the American public would pay with at least 100,000 lives for their decision for Clinton. Obviously I disagree with you. There are REASONS things happen!!
72 posted on 09/12/2001 10:11:18 AM PDT by armourup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truther Travis McGee
Your sure it wasn't "Usama (correct spelling) Bin Wannabe" yet your sure it was Bubbafuccos fault......uhhh huh. As much as I'd love to kick Usama Bil Klintoooons @ss for his crimes and imprision him for life, I will agree he weakened the implied perception of military response to such acts. I won't blame him for this act but will remember to put his BeeeeAcht's picture kissing Afarats Ho next to that of the WTC burning and collasping when she comes up for re-election.
73 posted on 09/12/2001 10:13:50 AM PDT by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt, the_doc, lukefreeman, oldglory, gonzo, seekingthetruth, all
#9: "I cannot tolerate one second of seeing the traitorous face of Hillary Clinton and her [DemocRAT] toadies in the midst of this heinous attack news coverage. She should be under arrest and sitting in a jail cell - along with Bubba.

I hope you don't mind that I changed the word "Democratic" to DemocRAT. There's nothing democratic about those Socialists/Trotskyites.

Hers is "the face" of the Emasculated Party [the DemocRAT Party] in America.

Clinton, "The Great Emasculator", was himself emasculated. No __MAN__ would EVER admire, or be married to, such a base mentality.

Her mouth was running in the Senate this morning, as if it wasn't UNAMERICAN, emasculated ideas, and practices like those she advocates that didn't INVITE this attack on America in the FIRST place.

74 posted on 09/12/2001 10:14:27 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (The Base of the earth are the base of the DemocRAT party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Queen Elizabeth of Iowa
No kidding! DID ANYONE ELSE SEE HELL-ARY'S SPEECH TODAY? CAMPAIGNING ALREADY ON THIS DAY OF NATIONAL GRIEF. WHAT AN OPPORTUNISTIC B**CH. She spoke for twice as long as President Bush, no accident I'm sure. I hate that woman.
75 posted on 09/12/2001 10:16:11 AM PDT by I'm ALL Right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: truther
Whew! At this point I'm just glad the fonts didn't get any bigger than they were!
76 posted on 09/12/2001 10:22:59 AM PDT by babylonian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
Thank you for relaying the info on the Tom Clancy interview. I did not see it. I imagine Judy Woodruff was about to pass out because she will hear about allowing such anti-Clintonista verbiage being aired. The Clinton / Demonazi propaganda wing will be all over her - expecting an apology. I expect hers will be profuse. I can hear her telling Hitlery now:

"I apologize - he got his statements out before I could stop him!!! It won't happen again."

I will bet dollars to donuts, Tom Clancy will never be asked by CNN for an interview again.

77 posted on 09/12/2001 10:28:56 AM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Great work as always, Alamo-Girl.

I think these clips deserve a thread of their own.

78 posted on 09/12/2001 10:30:44 AM PDT by reformed_democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Ditto your 66 and 74.
79 posted on 09/12/2001 10:34:03 AM PDT by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
Usama (correct spelling)

Oh Geez, give me a break. Who determines what the correct spelling of an Arabic name is? Tell me, is it Peking or Beijing? Is it Qaddafi or Kaddafi? I would answer rather that if you're going to be that ridiculously picky at a time like this, then you would have to write it in it's original language. Can't do that can you, so leave people alone. It's like telling someone whose house is on fire that they should make sure their house is clean for the firefighters when they arrive.

80 posted on 09/12/2001 10:49:14 AM PDT by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson