Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Twin Towers Were Designed to Take an Aircraft Hit, but Not Resulting Fire
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGA6GA5TIRC.html ^ | 9/12/01 | Sharon L. Crenson

Posted on 09/12/2001 1:09:42 AM PDT by kattracks

NEW YORK (AP) - The World Trade Center's twin towers were two of America's most visible symbols of engineering prowess, so when they crashed to the ground in an avalanche of ash, many asked how it could have happened.

Experts in skyscraper design and construction say it was probably simple: The 110-story towers were conceived to withstand powerful impacts, but their steel skeletons couldn't protect them from thousands of gallons of flaming jet fuel.

"Steel melts, and 24,000 gallons of aviation fluid melted the steel. Nothing is designed or will be designed to withstand that fire," said Hyman Brown, a University of Colorado civil engineering professor and the Trade Center's construction manager.

"If they did it lower in the building, the fire department could have gotten to it sooner. In its simplicity, it was brilliant," he said.

Masoud Sanayei, a civil engineering professor at Tufts University, said the fire's heat may have disconnected one of the towers' concrete floors from the tubular steel columns ringing the buildings. If one or two floors collapsed, it would have created a pancake effect of one massive floor caving into the next.

"In my opinion, the fire weakened the connection between the floor system and the columns on the higher floors and caused a couple of the floors to collapse," Sanayei said. "The floors are very heavy, made of reinforced concrete, so when one hits the next, they cause a domino effect ... and it can go all the way down to the first floor."

He said no one could be expected to survive such a catastrophe.

Brown, too, noted that although the twin towers had staircases in all four corners for evacuation, video clips led him to believe those escape routes were cut off for people on higher floors long before the buildings collapsed.

Architect Minoru Yamasaki, who died in 1986, worked with engineers John Skilling and Leslie E. Robertson to design the twin towers, once the world's tallest buildings.

In his 2000 book "Building Big," architect David MaCaulay described the towers' engineering as "a series of load bearing exterior columns spaced 3 feet apart and tied together at every floor by a deep horizontal beam, creating a strong lattice of square tubing around each tower."

The core surrounding the elevators inside was much the same, with a giant lattice work of steel covered by poured concrete connecting the interior columns to the exterior ones. The design was free enough for each of the towers to hold 4 million square feet of space unencumbered by columns or load bearing walls.

Sections of exterior wall were wrapped around the outside in 24- and 36-foot high sections, creating a sort of patchwork so that not all the floor joints would meet walls at the same height, according to MaCaulay.

Minoru Yamasaki Associates issued a statement saying the firm was in contact with authorities and had offered assistance.

"We believe that any speculation regarding the specifics of these tragic events would be irresponsible," the statement said. "For obvious reasons, MYA has no further comment at this time."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/12/2001 1:09:42 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Actually, I would correct Prof. Brown: It isn't that the Steel necessarily MELTED, but rather that it "crept" extremely. The steel doesn't have to "flow" in a fluid state, but rather becomes "plastic", very malleable and unable to hold the axial load placed upon it without buckling.

Then comes progressive collapse, and it's all over.

2 posted on 09/12/2001 1:17:23 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
It doesn't even have to flow plastically to lose its structural strength. Once that strength in one level goes, the weight of the building above it would be enough to pancake all the floors below, like an accordian, as suggested in this article.

I feel vindicated about my previous posts on this subject to other articles.

3 posted on 09/12/2001 4:03:40 AM PDT by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks,Illbay
I'd been mentally struggling to comprehend the collapse mechanism for those towers--so vividly and horribly imbedded in our minds from TV images."Domino Effect"--indeed descriptive of what we saw.Huge bare steel columns spaced 3' apart--no doubt an elegant solution from a cost standpoint- but having only short time resistance to 25 thousand gallons of flaming fuel.All metals and alloys lose yield and buckling strength at higher temperatures and vary a lot in this.(Studied extensively 45 years ago re engine valve material selection).Am not an architectural/civil engineer but suspect reinforced concrete columns would have resisted heat buckling far longer.

Well before that cascading collapse began most of those poor souls were already doomed.May God have mercy on them!

5 posted on 09/12/2001 6:04:26 AM PDT by IGNATIUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson